ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025
The prognostic influence of hospital type, method of first histological confirmation and time to chemotherapy in patients with advanced primary ovarian cancer.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Earlier is not always better: Optimal time to initiate adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery for ovarian cancer.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOvarian cancer is the fifth most common cancer in women and the leading cause of death of all gynecological malignancies. Prognosis is determined by optimal surgical outcome (macroscopic complete resection) most commonly achieved in tertiary hospitals. We investigated whether tertiary versus non-tertiary hospital as the location of an initial diagnostic intervention for histological confirmation before cytoreductive surgery versus immediate primary debulking surgery impacts outcome in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
methodsWe analyzed 115 patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery at a German tertiary center: 60 patients underwent primary debulking surgery (PDS) and 55 patients had a diagnostic intervention for histological confirmation before debulking surgery (PHC).
resultsAlthough there was no prognostic difference between the two subgroups, the median time to chemotherapy was longer in the PHC group (46 days) compared to the PDS group (26 days; p < 0.0001), equally seen comparing non-tertiary versus tertiary PHC groups (p: 0.0001), its impact confirmed in a multivariate analysis (PFS: HR: 1.03, 95%CI: 1.01-1.05, p: 0.007; OS: HR: 1.04, 95%CI: 1.02 -1.06, p: < 0.001) of the PHC group only. In total, 9/10 patients with port-site metastases after diagnostic laparoscopy were initially treated at non-tertiary hospitals, resulting in a lower PFS compared to patients without port-site metastases after laparoscopy (HR 0.21, 95%CI 0.06-0.733, p: 0.014).
conclusionsIn conclusion, patients with ovarian cancer undergoing treatment solely at a tertiary center have some clinical benefits and improved outcome, given the shorter time to chemotherapy and potential impact of port-site metastases. This supports centralization of oncological treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.