ReviewArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025
Current surgical treatment of uterine isthmocele: an update of existing literature.
Review in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07229209 (Oral Contraceptive Pills Versus Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System for the Management of Niche-Related Abnormal Uterine Bleeding), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Oral Contraceptive Pills Versus Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System for the Management of Niche-Related Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: A Prospective Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Investigating the clinical manifestations associated with isthmocele: a meta-analysis study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of four imaging modalities for cesarean scar defect: a retrospective study.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Folding Suture for Cesarean Scar Defect and Its Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes: A Retrospective Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- A reclassification and comprehensive examination of uterine arteriovenous malformation: insights derived from a case series.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Excision and Repair of Cesarean Scar Defect: A Scoping Review of the Literature.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Improving Precision and Safety in Uterine Isthmocele Repair by Utilizing the KOH Cup and Firefly Guidance.Cureus · 2025Article
- Analysis of outcomes of laparotomic, laparoscopic, and hysteroscopic symptomatic ısthmocele (niche) repair in Turkish women.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence of uterine isthmocele, also known as a uterine niche, has risen in parallel with increasing cesarean section (CS) rates, affecting approximately 60% of women depending on their history of cesarean deliveries. This condition, now categorized as cesarean scar disorder (CSD) by the "Delphi consensus," is characterized by one primary or two secondary symptoms. Diagnosis can be made through transvaginal ultrasound, sonohysterography, hysteroscopy, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Management of isthmocele may involve pharmacological or surgical interventions. This review aims to provide a thorough analysis of the surgical management options, focusing on postoperative symptom relief, intraoperative and postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and impact on secondary infertility. PubMed was comprehensively searched for observational studies from inception to 07.08.2024. Surgical treatments include hysteroscopic resection, laparoscopic procedures, and vaginal approaches, all of which offer comparable symptom relief. However, the vaginal approach is associated with a longer hospital stay. The robotic-assisted approach shows promising results but lacks extensive data. Among surgical options, hysteroscopic treatment has the fewest complications but is generally avoided when residual myometrial thickness (RMT) is less than 3 mm. While many CSDs remain asymptomatic, and some women with uterine isthmocele may not wish to conceive, symptomatic patients or those desiring to conceive may benefit from surgical intervention. The choice of procedure should be based on individual patient characteristics, particularly RMT, to define the most appropriate surgical approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39680143What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.