Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39680143›Full record

ReviewArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025

Current surgical treatment of uterine isthmocele: an update of existing literature.

Konstantinos Stavridis, Dimitrios Balafoutas, Nikos Vlahos, Ralf Joukhadar

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07229209 (Oral Contraceptive Pills Versus Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System for the Management of Niche-Related Abnormal Uterine Bleeding), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07229209 nacompletednot on this map

Oral Contraceptive Pills Versus Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System for the Management of Niche-Related Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: A Prospective Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBenha UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled166ConditionsAbnormal Uterine Bleeding, Cesarean Section Complications, Uterine ScarArmstransvaginal ultrasonography, monophasic combined oral contraceptive pill, 52 mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Konstantinos Stavridis *2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Aretaieion" University Hospital, Athens, Greece. Stavridis.kost@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6921-0573
Dimitrios Balafoutas *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Spital Männedorf, 8708, Männedorf, Switzerland.
Nikos Vlahos2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Aretaieion" University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Ralf JoukhadarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Spital Männedorf, 8708, Männedorf, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of uterine isthmocele, also known as a uterine niche, has risen in parallel with increasing cesarean section (CS) rates, affecting approximately 60% of women depending on their history of cesarean deliveries. This condition, now categorized as cesarean scar disorder (CSD) by the "Delphi consensus," is characterized by one primary or two secondary symptoms. Diagnosis can be made through transvaginal ultrasound, sonohysterography, hysteroscopy, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Management of isthmocele may involve pharmacological or surgical interventions. This review aims to provide a thorough analysis of the surgical management options, focusing on postoperative symptom relief, intraoperative and postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and impact on secondary infertility. PubMed was comprehensively searched for observational studies from inception to 07.08.2024. Surgical treatments include hysteroscopic resection, laparoscopic procedures, and vaginal approaches, all of which offer comparable symptom relief. However, the vaginal approach is associated with a longer hospital stay. The robotic-assisted approach shows promising results but lacks extensive data. Among surgical options, hysteroscopic treatment has the fewest complications but is generally avoided when residual myometrial thickness (RMT) is less than 3 mm. While many CSDs remain asymptomatic, and some women with uterine isthmocele may not wish to conceive, symptomatic patients or those desiring to conceive may benefit from surgical intervention. The choice of procedure should be based on individual patient characteristics, particularly RMT, to define the most appropriate surgical approach.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionCicatrixUterine DiseasesUterusFemaleHumansHysteroscopyLaparoscopyLength of StayPostoperative ComplicationsPregnancyIsthmoceleManagementNicheSurgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.