ArticleBioprocess and biosystems engineering2025
Sampling-free investigation of microbial carbon source preferences on renewable feedstocks via online monitoring of oxygen transfer rate.
Article in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acetate-containing supernatants from industrial off-gas cultivation enabling high-value product formation with established and emerging production organisms.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2026Article
- Online Monitoring of Oxygen Transfer Rate as a Versatile Tool for Fermentation Characterization and Optimization.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The transition towards sustainable bioprocesses requires renewable feedstocks to reduce dependency on finite resources. While plant-based feedstocks offer significant potential, their complex composition poses new challenges. The microorganisms often exhibit polyauxic growth when presented with multiple carbon sources simultaneously, consuming them in a distinct order according to their carbon source preferences. The traditional investigation of polyauxic growth involves laborious sampling and offline analysis, hindering high-throughput screenings. This study introduces an efficient method for identifying carbon source consumption and their order of metabolization by various microorganisms using the respiration activity monitoring system (RAMOS) in shake flasks. As aerobic carbon metabolization and oxygen consumption are strictly correlated, the characteristic phases of polyauxic growth are visible in the oxygen transfer rate (OTR) and can be assigned to the respective carbon sources. An extended 16-flask RAMOS enables real-time monitoring of microbial respiration on up to seven carbon sources and one reference cultivation simultaneously, thus providing crucial insights into their metabolization without extensive sampling and offline analysis. The method's accuracy was validated against traditional high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Its applicability to both fast-growing Escherichia coli (investigated carbon sources: glucose, arabinose, sorbitol, xylose, and glycerol) and slow-growing Ustilago trichophora (glucose, glycerol, xylose, sorbitol, rhamnose, galacturonic acid, and lactic acid) was demonstrated. Additionally, it was successfully applied to the plant-based second-generation feedstock corn leaf hydrolysate, revealing the bioavailability of the included carbon sources (glucose, sucrose, arabinose, xylose, and galactose) and their order of metabolization by Ustilago maydis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.