Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39680133›Full record

Trial reportMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2025

[Structured triage in the emergency department via intelligent assistant service OPTINOFA : Results of a multicenter, cluster-randomized and controlled interventional study in Germany].

Sabine Blaschke, Harald Dormann, Rajan Somasundaram, Christoph Dodt, Ingo Graeff, Hans-Jörg Busch, Bernadett Erdmann, Marc Wieckenberg, Christoph Haedicke, Katrin Esslinger and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Sabine BlaschkeZentrale Notaufnahme, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (UMG), Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland. sblasch@gwdg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8800-7554
Harald DormannZentrale Notaufnahme, Klinikum Fürth, Fürth, Deutschland.
Rajan SomasundaramZentrale Notaufnahme und Aufnahmestation, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
Christoph DodtKlinik für Akut- und Notfallmedizin, München Klinik Bogenhausen, München, Deutschland.
Ingo GraeffAbteilung für Klinische Akut- und Notfallmedizin, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland.
Hans-Jörg BuschZentrum für Notfall- u. Rettungsmedizin, Universitäts-Notfallzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
Bernadett ErdmannZentrale Notaufnahme, Klinikum Wolfsburg, Wolfsburg, Deutschland.
Marc WieckenbergZentrale Notaufnahme, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Göttingen-Weende, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Christoph HaedickeZentrale Notaufnahme, Städtisches Klinikum Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Deutschland.
Katrin EsslingerZentrale Notaufnahme, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (UMG), Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Elisabeth NyounguiZentrale Notaufnahme, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (UMG), Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Tim FriedeInstitut für Medizinische Statistik, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (UMG), Göttingen, Deutschland.
Felix WalcherAKTIN-Notaufnahmeregister, Universitätsklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
Julia TalamoIGES-Institut, Berlin, Deutschland.
Julia K WolffIGES-Institut, Berlin, Deutschland.
OPTINOFA Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Germany, a substantial reform of emergency care is strictly recommended. Regulation of patient flows into the ambulatory and stationary sectors remains a major issue.In the OPTINOFA project funded by Innovationsfunds, a new triage system was developed for a structured primary evaluation of both urgency and care level of emergency cases. OPTINOFA was evaluated in a cluster-randomized, controlled multicenter trial using a stepped-wedge design in eight emergency departments (ED) from 1 July 2019 to 31 May 2021. Additionally, data from one ED were used for comparison of temporal changes without intervention. The primary study endpoint represented the increase of patient transfers to the ambulatory sector; secondary endpoints included the outcome, process and quality indicators as well as mean emergency care costs.In the study, 46,558 emergency cases were included in the control period and 37,485 emergency cases in the intervention period. Concerning the primary endpoint, a significant increase of transfers to the ambulatory sector were detected in the per-protocol EDs (p < 0.001, odds ratio = 10.59). Waiting times were significantly reduced by an average 20 min in the intervention phase. Furthermore, a stable admission rate was found within 3 days after initial ED presentation. Cost analysis revealed no increase of treatment expenses within 28 days after ED admission.In this project a valid assistant service for structured primary evaluation of urgency and care level was successfully developed for emergency cases and served as a digital triage instrument with interoperable format. Clinical trial results revealed great potential for the OPTINOFA triage system to control patient flows in emergency and acute medicine.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalTriageFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient TransferClinical emergency and acute medicineDigital assessment instrumentEmergency departmentIntelligent assistant serviceQuality indicatorsStructured assessmentTriage

Identifiers

PMID39680133
PMCPMC12504124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.