ArticleExperimental brain research2024
Motor information contributes to visuotactile interaction in trunk-centered peripersonal space during a pedaling situation.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Peripersonal space (PPS), the space immediately surrounding one's body, contributes to interactions with the external environment. Previous studies have demonstrated that PPS expands during whole-body self-motion. Furthermore, motor and proprioceptive information contributes to this phenomenon. However, no study has disentangled the role of motor commands. Therefore, this study investigated the role of motor commands via a bike pedaling situation in a virtual reality environment. We compared three self-motion conditions: active condition where participants actively pedaled at a constant speed, passive condition where they were forced to pedal by the pedaling (exercise) device, and no-pedaling condition where they did not pedal at all. Participants observed large-field optic flow that simulated forward self-motion in all the conditions. For PPS measurements, we asked participants to quickly respond to the tactile stimulus on their chests when they observed an approaching visual probe. The PPS range was defined as the maximum distance at which the visual probe facilitated tactile detection (visual-facilitation effect). Results showed that the visual-facilitation effects were larger in the active pedaling condition than in the no-pedaling condition. Furthermore, the effects were attenuated as the probe distances from the body increased. These results suggest that motor command information can strongly contribute to PPS expansion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39680109What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.