SynthesisPediatric cardiology2025
A Meta-Analysis of Mitral Surgery in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Anomalous Left Coronary Artery: When to Perform Repair?
Synthesis in Pediatric cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study is the first meta-analysis comparing long-term outcomes in patients undergoing correction for anomalous left coronary artery (ALCAPA) regarding concomitant mitral valve surgery. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify all relevant studies with comparative data on mitral valve surgery performed during surgery for ALCAPA correction. Predefined primary end points included mortality and mitral valve (re)operation. Echocardiographic outcomes were assessed when available (including severity of mitral regurgitation). Fifty-three relevant retrospective studies with comparative data for ALCAPA patients with concomitant mitral valve surgery were identified from the existing literature. The study population included 3,851 patients, of whom 55% were girls. The mean age at surgery was 6 months [0-99 months]. The mean follow-up after surgery was 22.7 years [6.3-37.2]. Among patients with available echocardiographic data at the time of ALCAPA correction, 283 had no mitral regurgitation (13%), 642 had mild mitral regurgitation (30%), 756 had moderate mitral regurgitation (36%), and 437 had severe mitral regurgitation (21%). A subgroup of patients who underwent mitral valve surgery (yMVS; n = 753; 19.5% of the total population) was identified. A total of 228 patients died during follow-up (5.9%), with no differences among patients who underwent vs those who did not undergo mitral valve concomitant surgery at baseline (p = ns). Among the 1,536 patients with available follow-up echocardiographic data, 519 had no mitral regurgitation (34%), 663 had mild mitral regurgitation (43%), 268 had moderate mitral regurgitation (17%), and 86 had severe mitral regurgitation (6%). Overall, during follow-up, 91 patients underwent mitral valve surgery (first MVS for 20 pts and reintervention for 71 pts, representing a 10% reintervention rate). In regression analysis, we found no association between the mean age at first surgery and the need for reoperation (p = 0.458). Mitral valve surgery is performed in about 20% of patients undergoing ALCAPA correction. Indications for MVS vary among centers, although the severity of MV regurgitation was the most common criterion (more than 50% of the yMVS group). Of yMVS patients, approximately 10% underwent a second MVS during follow-up, regardless of age at first surgery. Overall, long-term mortality in these patients is over 5%, with no evident impact related to concomitant MV surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39680071What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.