ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025
Preclinical comparison of (radio)lanthanides using mass spectrometry and nuclear imaging techniques: biodistribution of lanthanide-based tumor-targeting agents and lanthanides in ionic form.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative theranostic efficacy ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Lanthanide Nanotheranostics in Radiotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWith the growing interest in exploring radiolanthanides for nuclear medicine applications, the question arises as to whether they are generally interchangeable without affecting a biomolecule's pharmacokinetic properties. The goal of this study was to investigate similarities and differences of four (radio)lanthanides simultaneously applied as complexes of biomolecules or in ionic form.
methodsInductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) was employed for the simultaneous detection of four lanthanides (Ln = lutetium, terbium, gadolinium and europium) in biological samples. In vitro tumor cell uptake and in vivo biodistribution studies were performed with Ln-DOTATATE, Ln-DOTA-LM3, Ln-PSMA-617 and Ln-OxFol-1. AR42J cells, PC-3 PIP cells and KB cells expressing the somatostatin receptor, the prostate-specific membrane antigen and the folate receptor, respectively, were used in vitro as well as to obtain the respective tumor mouse models for in vivo studies. The distribution of lanthanides in ionic form was investigated in immunocompetent mice. Dual-isotope SPECT/CT imaging studies were performed with mice administered with the radiolabeled biomolecules or chloride salts of lutetium-177 and terbium-161.
resultsSimilar in vitro cell uptake was observed for all four lanthanide complexes of each biomolecule into the respective tumor cell lines. AR42J tumor uptake of Ln-DOTATATE and Ln-DOTA-LM3 in mice showed similar values for all lanthanide complexes (3.8‒5.1% ID/g and 4.5‒5.0% ID/g; 1 h p.i., respectively). Accumulation of Ln-PSMA-617 in PC-3 PIP tumors (24-25% ID/g; 1 h p.i.) and of Ln-OxFol-1 in KB tumors (28-31% ID/g; 24 h p.i.) were also equal for the four lanthanide complexes of each biomolecule. After injection of lanthanide chloride salts (LnCl
conclusionsThe presented study confirmed similar properties of Ln-complexes, suggesting that lutetium-177 can be replaced by other radiolanthanides, most probably without affecting the tissue distribution profile of the resultant radiopharmaceuticals. On the other hand, the different radii of the lanthanide ions affected their uptake and resorption mechanisms in liver and bones when injected in uncomplexed form.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.