ArticlePsychology and aging2025
Trajectories of episodic memory in midlife: Historical change from a cross-country perspective.
Article in Psychology and aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pain during midlife: a cross-national analysis of cohort differences in reports of pain in the United States, Europe, South Korea, and Mexico.American journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Historical change in midlife trajectories of self-reported sensory functioning across 16 nations.The Gerontologist · 2026Article
- Historical Change in Midlife Development from a Cross-National Perspective.Current directions in psychological science · 2026Article
- Midlife blues: A lifespan perspective on midlife depressive symptoms.Psychology and aging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
According to the Flynn effect, performance on cognitive ability tests has improved over the past decades. However, we know very little about whether such historical improvements generalize to middle-aged adults (aged 45-65) and differ across nations. We used harmonized data on episodic memory from nationally representative longitudinal panel surveys across a total of 16 countries (United States, Mexico, China, England, and countries in Continental, Mediterranean, and Nordic Europe). We compared historical change in age-related trajectories of episodic memory among middle-aged adults. Our sample included 117,231 participants who provided 330,390 observations. Longitudinal multilevel regression models revealed that today's middle-aged adults in the United States perform worse on episodic memory tests than their peers in the past. By contrast, today's middle-aged adults in most other countries perform better on these tests than their peers in the past. However, later-born cohorts of U.S. and Chinese middle-aged adults experienced less steep within-person decrements-or even increments-in episodic memory than earlier born cohorts. Historical change trends persisted when controlling for sociodemographic factors, as well as for indicators of physical and mental health. Differences in episodic memory by gender and education became smaller over historical time across all nations. Our findings suggest that countries differ considerably in episodic memory performance, by more than half a standard deviation, and in the direction and size of how midlife episodic memory trajectories have changed over historical time. Further factors related to historical changes in midlife episodic memory need to be identified by future research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.