ReviewJournal of radiation research2024
Role of radiation emergency medicine: historical view-a perspective on the past, present, and future.
Review in Journal of radiation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The more science progresses, the more life and society change. Medicine also changes with the times and the culture. This is also true for radiation emergency medicine, which includes dose-assessment leading to diagnosis, treatment, medical follow-up and prognosis of persons who have developed acute injury or illness due to radioactive contamination or radiation exposure. Before the report of X-rays by Roentgen, there was evidence that X-rays had been emitted from the electrically excited Crookes tube and that skin injury had been caused by the X-rays. Thus, the history of radiation and its exposure started before Roentgen. During the early stage of radiation use, people were simply exposed to radiation but were unaware of any danger. Radioactive materials were found soon after Roentgen's report, and contamination with these materials occurred. Together with the development of science and technology, sophisticated radiation devices were produced, and the use and application of radiation became much enhanced. New radionuclides were found one after another, leading to identification of different qualities of radiation. Development of nuclear physics allowed people to artificially produce radionuclides and to construct a nuclear reactor. After World War II, nuclear power plants were constructed, and related facilities such as nuclear fuel processing, reprocessing and spent fuel storage facilities were built. If radiation accidents or events occur at such facilities, radiation exposure with thermal or chemical burns could occur. Together with the expansion of globalism in the world and division in the society, there are now increasing concerns regarding the malicious usage of radiation by radiological dispersal devices (RDDs) including a dirty bomb. Upon detonation of RDDs, blast and thermal injuries with radiation exposure could be caused. In the present society, the natures of exposure to radiation and contamination with radioactive materials have become much more complicated. Not even mentioning the atomic bomb, the detonation of RDDs also necessitates scenarios of medical responses to complicated injuries and the involvement of numbers of people. This article looks back at the history of radiation and addresses the medical responses to radiation injuries that change with the times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.