ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2024
Nuclear quantum effects on glassy water under pressure: Vitrification and pressure-induced transformations.
Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nuclear Quantum Effects on the Equation of State of Water: Insights from the Potential Energy Landscape Formalism.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Understanding Isotope Substitution Effects in Water Using the Potential Energy Landscape Formalism for Quantum Liquids.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Computational investigation of water glasses using machine-learning potentials.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Isotope-Substitution Effects on the Thermodynamic, Dynamic, and Structural Properties of Water: HThe journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We perform classical molecular dynamics (MD) and path-integral MD (PIMD) simulations of H2O and D2O using the q-TIP4P/F model over a wide range of temperatures and pressures to study the nuclear quantum effects (NQEs) on (i) the vitrification of liquid water upon isobaric cooling at different pressures and (ii) pressure-induced transformations at constant temperature between low-density amorphous and high-density amorphous ice (LDA and HDA) and hexagonal ice Ih and HDA. Upon isobaric cooling, classical and quantum H2O and D2O vitrify into a continuum of intermediate amorphous ices (IA), with densities in-between those of LDA and HDA (depending on pressure). Importantly, the density of the IA varies considerably if NQEs are included (similar conclusions hold for ice Ih at all pressures studied). While the structure of the IA is not very sensitive to NQE, the geometry of the hydrogen-bond (HB) is. NQE leads to longer and less linear HB in LDA, HDA, and ice Ih than found in the classical case. Interestingly, the delocalization of the H/D atoms is non-negligible and identical in LDA, HDA, and ice Ih at all pressures studied. Our isothermal compression/decompression MD/PIMD simulations show that classical and quantum H2O and D2O all exhibit LDA-HDA and ice Ih-HDA transformations, consistent with experiments. The inclusion of NQE leads to a softer HB-network, which lowers slightly the LDA/ice Ih-to-HDA transformation pressures. Interestingly, the HB in HDA is longer and less linear than in LDA, which is counterintuitive given that HDA is ≈25% denser than LDA. Overall, our results show that, while classical computer simulations provide the correct qualitative phenomenology of ice and glassy water, NQEs are necessary for a quantitative description.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.