ArticleBiomedical optics express2024
Silver mean sequence in extended depth of focus intraocular lenses: a comparative study of kinoform and stepwise designs.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Focusing performance of Fibonacci tiling-based zone plates.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Shedding Light on Halos: Quantifying the Impact of the Diffractive Profile in Multifocal Intraocular Lenses.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Introduction to the feature Issue "Improving Vision through Intraocular Lenses": a tribute to Jim Schwiegerling.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, we present two new multifocal intraocular lens (MIOL) designs, both based on the silver mean kinoform diffractive lens. We demonstrate that a single aperiodic diffractive profile can be used to create two different MIOLs: one with a kinoform structure and the other with a stepwise profile. Quantitative assessment of the designs was carried out using the through focus modulation transfer function and the area under the modulation transfer function for the prediction of their visual performance. Our results show that both designs exhibit nearly identical optical performance at the design wavelength (λ = 550 nm), though their intrinsic longitudinal chromatic aberration differs significantly. Given that diffractive extended depth of focus (EDoF) intraocular lenses are prone to image degradation due to dysphotopic phenomena, we also compared the halos generated by these two designs and found notable differences in their behavior. Furthermore, under photopic conditions, the proposed lens designs demonstrated the potential to achieve visual acuity values of 0.2 logMAR or better across a vergence range from approximately 0 to 2 D. Finally, to qualitatively assess the behavior of the MIOLs, an objective experimental evaluation was conducted using an adaptive optics visual simulator in a model eye. Experimental results align with the quantitative assessment of the proposed designs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.