ArticleBiomedical optics express2024
Pre-clinical methods to evaluate photic phenomena in intraocular lenses.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Halo Measurements in Simulated Multifocal Intraocular Lenses.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- The Effect of the Capsular Bag on the Optical Performance of an IOL Measured in an Ex Vivo Model.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Shedding Light on Halos: Quantifying the Impact of the Diffractive Profile in Multifocal Intraocular Lenses.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Introduction to the feature Issue "Improving Vision through Intraocular Lenses": a tribute to Jim Schwiegerling.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A new system and methodology are introduced to evaluate photic phenomena induced by different intraocular lens (IOL) technologies using a "see-through" IOL analyzer system in phakic subjects. Nineteen phakic subjects looked through the Groningen IOL Telescope type 1 (GIT1) system under different conditions. Four different IOL designs with different clinical levels of photic phenomena were evaluated by the subjects. Subjects were asked to give a subjective rating of each lens and perform a psychophysical test. The results of this study were compared to the clinical outcomes of the subjective perception of halo, glare, and starbursts of cataract patients implanted with the same IOL models. Depending on the visual test performed, a good correlation can be found between the tests performed here and the bother levels of real cataract patients. The results validate the use of this methodology to evaluate preclinical visual symptoms. The system could be a powerful tool for the design and development of new optical designs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.