ArticleBiomedical optics express2024
Do diffractive intraocular lenses break the beneficial interaction between chromatic and monochromatic aberrations in the eye?
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Chromatic Aberration on White-Light Contrast Sensitivity With Higher-Order Monochromatic Aberrations Correction in the Human Eye in Screen-Based Vision.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Introduction to the feature Issue "Improving Vision through Intraocular Lenses": a tribute to Jim Schwiegerling.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates whether a diffractive presbyopia-correcting multifocal intraocular lens disrupts the favorable interaction between chromatic and monochromatic aberrations in the eye. This is analyzed not only for distant objects but also for closer viewing distances, where the lens utilizes different diffraction orders depending on its design. We consider diffractive designs based on the zero-diffraction order for far vision and the first diffraction order for near vision (i.e., 0F/+1N design). Within the limitations of clinical visual acuity examination in various groups of subjects, our results prove that diffractive presbyopia-correcting lenses with 0F/+1N design preserve the beneficial interaction between chromatic and monochromatic aberrations at both far and near vision. The results are obtained for lenses with varying energy efficiency distributions between the far and near focal points, ranging from balanced (bifocal contact lens) to far-dominant (50% far, 30% near in a trifocal intraocular lens) configurations. These findings are specific to the 0F/+1N design and cannot be extrapolated to other diffractive lens types.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.