ArticleBiomedical optics express2024
Visually relevant on-bench through-focus analysis of intraocular lenses.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diffractive intraocular lenses reshape 577-nm retinal laser photocoagulation spots in a model eye.Lasers in medical science · 2026Article
- Halo assessment in intraocular lenses through high dynamic range images.Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2026Article
- Limitations of OTF-based metrics for predicting through-focus visual acuity in pseudophakic eyes.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Assessment of Diffractive Intraocular Lenses Using Near-Infrared Light: A Critical Evaluation.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Introduction to the feature Issue "Improving Vision through Intraocular Lenses": a tribute to Jim Schwiegerling.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cataract surgery involves the implantation of an intraocular lens (IOL) to replace the opacified crystalline lens. Monofocal IOLs, the most common type, are intended to have the eye in focus at a given distance, usually at infinity. Simultaneous vision IOLs (SVIOLs) and extended depth of focus (EDOF) aim to minimize postoperative dependence on spectacles by providing either multiple foci or an extended depth of focus. These lenses utilize a variety of diffractive and refractive designs to achieve varied focal depths. While common optical testing methods based on the IOL's modulation transfer function (MTF) or resolving power at best focus are essential for quality control, they do not fully address the lenses' performance requirements in daily visual tasks such as reading in a variety of distances. The purpose of this work was to introduce a visually relevant on-bench test method, which includes an image analysis technique and a visual acuity-related image quality metric, to evaluate the through-focus performance of different commercially available IOLs. This method consists of recording a series of optotype images in a realistic eye model with the IOL, adjusting the stimulus vergence through a focus-tunable lens. We compare the results obtained with mono-focal, enhanced mono-focal, EDOF, and (diffractive) trifocal IOLs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.