ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2024
Standardly Trained Peer Volunteer-Led, Social App Recruiting-Based Human Immunodeficiency Virus Testing Strategy Using Rapid Testing Kits (SPARK) Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Population-Based Survey Evaluation.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Social app recruiting-based and peer-led testing strategies have been proven effective in increasing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing among men who have sex with men (MSM), though their combination remains underevaluated. We aimed to assess the efficiency of a combined strategy named "standardly trained peer volunteer-led, social app recruiting-based HIV testing strategy using rapid testing kits" (SPARK). Methods: Between March 2020 and December 2021, 177 trained peer volunteers tested 7256 eligible MSM testers. Volunteers primarily recruited testers to undergo HIV testing and counseling in social apps. Volunteers tested testers with HIV rapid antibody tests and interviewed testers while waiting for the results. Moreover, HIV testing data from other testing strategies, both pre- and postimplementation of SPARK, were collected to evaluate the capacity of SPARK to increase HIV testing. Results: During this study, MSM testers underwent 10 441 HIV tests; HIV testing volume increased 3-fold from 2020 to 2021. On average, each volunteer recruited 40.99 testers and facilitated 58.99 HIV tests. After SPARK implementation, HIV tests in 2021 increased 1-fold compared with those in 2019; especially for rural MSM testers, the number of HIV tests performed in 2020 and 2021 increased to 2.86 and 5.85 times, respectively, that in 2019. In spatial analysis, most testers sought geographical proximity volunteers for testing; similarly, most testers recruited were from volunteers' own or nearby districts. More than 60% of HIV tests were performed outside of working hours on weekdays, regardless of whether the testers came from urban, periurban, or rural areas. Conclusions: SPARK, an MSM-friendly, geographically accessible, and time-flexible testing strategy, has the potential to promote HIV testing among MSM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.