Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39679295›Full record

ArticleiScience2024

Norway rats recruit cooperation partners based on previous receipt of help while disregarding kinship.

Sacha C Engelhardt, Niklas I Paulsson, Michael Taborsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sacha C EngelhardtDepartment of Sociobiology and Anthropology, Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach Institute for Zoology and Anthropology, University of Göttingen, 37077 Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Niklas I PaulssonBehavioural Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, 3032 Hinterkappelen, Bern, Switzerland.
Michael TaborskyBehavioural Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, 3032 Hinterkappelen, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Norway rats are known to liberate trapped conspecifics, which implies an empathic response to the deplorable situation of the captive. If this is an altruistic behavior reflecting an evolved decision rule, the requisite fitness enhancement to the actor may result either from close relatedness or the expectation of future returns. Neither potential effects of relatedness nor of reciprocal returns have yet been examined. Our two-stage experiment revealed that wild-type Norway rats preferably collaborated with partners that had previously freed them from a trap and subsequently cooperated with each other, indicating that expected future benefits may underlie the deliverance of trapped companions. Relatedness had no effect on their cooperative propensity. These results show that rats recruit partners to coordinate cooperation by direct reciprocity but not kin discrimination, suggesting that the evolutionary mechanism responsible for the altruistic liberation behavior of Norway rats may be reciprocal altruism rather than kin selection.

Indexed as

Evolutionary biologyRodent behaviorZoology

Identifiers

PMID39679295
PMCPMC11638632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.