Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39679140›Full record

ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2024

Evaluating Large Language Model-Supported Instructions for Medication Use: First Steps Toward a Comprehensive Model.

Zilma Silveira Nogueira Reis, Adriana Silvina Pagano, Isaias Jose Ramos de Oliveira, Cristiane Dos Santos Dias, Eura Martins Lage, Erico Franco Mineiro, Glaucia Miranda Varella Pereira, Igor de Carvalho Gomes, Vinicius Araujo Basilio, Ricardo João Cruz-Correia and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The Accuracy And Clinical Relevance of Chat GPT-4 in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Research.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Zilma Silveira Nogueira ReisHealth Informatics Center, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Adriana Silvina PaganoArts Faculty, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Isaias Jose Ramos de OliveiraHealth Informatics Center, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Cristiane Dos Santos DiasDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Eura Martins LageHealth Informatics Center, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Erico Franco MineiroDepartment of Design Technology, School of Architecture, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Glaucia Miranda Varella PereiraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Igor de Carvalho GomesDepartamento de Medicina da Comunidade Informação e Decisão em Saúde, National Secretary of Primary Care of the Brazilian Ministry of Health, Brasília, Brazil.
Vinicius Araujo BasilioHealth Informatics Center, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Ricardo João Cruz-CorreiaMEDCIDS, Porto University, Porto, Portugal.
Davi Dos Reis de JesusDepartment of Computer Science, Universidade Federal de São João Del Rei, São João del Rei, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Antônio Pereira de Souza JúniorDepartment of Computer Science, Universidade Federal de São João Del Rei, São João del Rei, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Leonardo Chaves Dutra da RochaDepartment of Computer Science, Universidade Federal de São João Del Rei, São João del Rei, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-009289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the support of large language models (LLMs) in generating clearer and more personalized medication instructions to enhance e-prescription. Patients and Methods: We established patient-centered guidelines for adequate, acceptable, and personalized directions to enhance e-prescription. A dataset comprising 104 outpatient scenarios, with an array of medications, administration routes, and patient conditions, was developed following the Brazilian national e-prescribing standard. Three prompts were submitted to a closed-source LLM. The first prompt involved a generic command, the second one was calibrated for content enhancement and personalization, and the third one requested bias mitigation. The third prompt was submitted to an open-source LLM. Outputs were assessed using automated metrics and human evaluation. We conducted the study between March 1, 2024 and September 10, 2024. Results: Adequacy scores of our closed-source LLM's output showed the third prompt outperforming the first and second one. Full and partial acceptability was achieved in 94.3% of texts with the third prompt. Personalization was rated highly, especially with the second and third prompts. The 2 LLMs showed similar adequacy results. Lack of scientific evidence and factual errors were infrequent and unrelated to a particular prompt or LLM. The frequency of hallucinations was different for each LLM and concerned prescriptions issued upon symptom manifestation and medications requiring dosage adjustment or involving intermittent use. Gender bias was found in our closed-source LLM's output for the first and second prompts, with the third one being bias-free. The second LLM's output was bias-free. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the potential of LLM-supported generation to produce prescription directions and improve communication between health professionals and patients within the e-prescribing system.

Identifiers

PMID39679140
PMCPMC11638470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.