ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2024
Evaluating Large Language Model-Supported Instructions for Medication Use: First Steps Toward a Comprehensive Model.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence-based tools for patient support to enhance medication adherence: a focused review.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Pooled it
- Large Language Model-Generated Patient Instructions for Prescriptions in Primary Health Care: Preclinical Algorithm Validation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- The Accuracy And Clinical Relevance of Chat GPT-4 in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Research.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To assess the support of large language models (LLMs) in generating clearer and more personalized medication instructions to enhance e-prescription. Patients and Methods: We established patient-centered guidelines for adequate, acceptable, and personalized directions to enhance e-prescription. A dataset comprising 104 outpatient scenarios, with an array of medications, administration routes, and patient conditions, was developed following the Brazilian national e-prescribing standard. Three prompts were submitted to a closed-source LLM. The first prompt involved a generic command, the second one was calibrated for content enhancement and personalization, and the third one requested bias mitigation. The third prompt was submitted to an open-source LLM. Outputs were assessed using automated metrics and human evaluation. We conducted the study between March 1, 2024 and September 10, 2024. Results: Adequacy scores of our closed-source LLM's output showed the third prompt outperforming the first and second one. Full and partial acceptability was achieved in 94.3% of texts with the third prompt. Personalization was rated highly, especially with the second and third prompts. The 2 LLMs showed similar adequacy results. Lack of scientific evidence and factual errors were infrequent and unrelated to a particular prompt or LLM. The frequency of hallucinations was different for each LLM and concerned prescriptions issued upon symptom manifestation and medications requiring dosage adjustment or involving intermittent use. Gender bias was found in our closed-source LLM's output for the first and second prompts, with the third one being bias-free. The second LLM's output was bias-free. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the potential of LLM-supported generation to produce prescription directions and improve communication between health professionals and patients within the e-prescribing system.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.