ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2024
Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Fixation Methods for Percutaneous Extracapsular Transverse Cervical Metatarsal Osteotomy in a Hallux Valgus Sawbone Model.
Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- One Versus Two Screw Fixation in Minimally Invasive Hallux Valgus Surgery: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Fixation Methods for Percutaneous Extracapsular Transverse Cervical Metatarsal Osteotomy in a Hallux Valgus Sawbone Model.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is limited literature available that provide information about fixation methods for minimally invasive hallux valgus osteotomies. Our objective was to evaluate the strength of different fixation methods for a percutaneous extracapsular transverse cervical metatarsal (PTCM) osteotomy in a sawbone model. Methods: Thirty solid foam sawbone foot models were used. Percutaneous extracapsular transverse cervical metatarsal osteotomies were performed and fixed in a standardized fashion in 6 different groups: (1) one 4.0-mm screw; (2) 2 (one 4.0-mm and one 3.0-mm) parallel screws; (3) 2 (one 4.0-mm and one 3.0-mm) divergent screws; (4) same as group 3, but with lateral metatarsal head cortex purchase with the 4.0-mm screw; (5) same as group 4, but with two 4.0-mm screws; (6) same as group 5, but with two 3.5-mm screws. Cyclic and load to failure testing were performed applying a plantar load to the metatarsal head. The measured variables were stiffness and force needed to create deformity using a Zwick Roell Universal Testing Machine. Results: Group 1 failed as a result of rotational instability in cyclic testing. In load to failure testing, group 3 did not achieve difference compared with group 2 ( Conclusion: In this sawbones-based study, we found that the use of two 4.0-mm screws or use of a 3.0-mm screw and a 4.0-mm screw with lateral first metatarsal head cortical purchase was superior to other screw configurations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.