ArticleTranslational animal science2024
Neither increasing the frequency of sow feedings nor decreasing the interval between feedings prior to farrowing reduced piglet stillbirths.
Article in Translational animal science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Farrowing durations that exceed 240 min cause stillborn rates to increase. Therefore, feeding strategies in late gestation have been studied to mitigate the negative consequences of extended farrowing durations. A total of 1,501 sows (PIC 1050 Camborough) were used for this study at two individual farms near Carthage, IL. Farm 1 (758 sows) was a porcine reproductive and respiratory virus (PRRSv) stable (previously experienced a PRRSv outbreak and is currently vaccinated for PRRSv) with an older parity structure (3.67). Farm 2 (743 sows) was PRRSv positive (sows with pigs demonstrating Ct values <36 determined by pig processing fluids) and had a younger parity structure (2.96). Sows were moved into farrowing rooms at approximately day 112 of gestation and started on their respective treatment. Treatment 1 sows were fed 1 meal of 2.27 kg per day at 0600 h. Treatment 2 sows were fed two equal meals of 1.13 kg (2.27 kg total) at 0600 and 1400 h. Treatment 3 sows were fed two equal meals of 1.13 kg (2.27 kg total) at 0600 and 1800 h. Treatment 4 sows were fed three equal meals of 0.77 kg (2.27 kg total) at 0600, 1400, and 2200 h. Treatments were assigned to farrowing rooms in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin Square arrangement of treatments where each treatment was fed in each room one time at each farm. Daily feed intakes were recorded from the time sows were introduced to the farrowing room until 5 d after farrowing. The total number of pigs born, pigs born alive, stillbirths, and mummies were recorded for each litter within 24 h of farrowing. Live pigs were weighed as a group to record litter birth weight. Pig mortality and morbidities were recorded until 5 d after farrowing. The total number of pigs born and pigs born alive were not different (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.