Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39679048›Full record

ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2024

Assessing the efficacy of mind mapping as a learning technique to enhance information retrieval in nursing students.

Mangesh Jabade, Husain Nadaf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mangesh JabadeDepartment of Community Health Nursing, Symbiosis College of Nursing, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Husain NadafDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, Symbiosis College of Nursing, Symbiosis International (Deemed) University, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNursing education, rooted in conventional methods like didactic lectures and clinical experiences, is evolving to incorporate innovative learning strategies. This study delves into the effectiveness of mind mapping, an interactive technique, in enhancing information retrieval skills among nursing students. Departing from linear note-taking, mind maps visually organize information, aligning with contemporary learning theories emphasizing visual and interactive modalities. MATERIALS AND

methodsMethodologically, a quasi-experimental design with a crossover intervention was employed, involving 144 nursing students in Pune City, Maharashtra; the time taken to conduct the study was 2 months. The study focused on acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and chronic renal failure (CRF), employing pre-tests, post-tests, and long-term retention assessments.

resultsResults indicated significantly higher knowledge gains and retention with mind mapping, substantiated by effect size analyses. Student perceptions, assessed through a Likert scale, revealed widespread agreement on mind mapping's clarity, effectiveness, and positive impact on understanding and retention. Challenges included the need for faculty and student training, highlighting the importance of integration and support in educational institutions.

conclusionThis study explores the effectiveness of mind mapping as a learning technique in nursing education, aiming to enhance knowledge acquisition, retention, and critical thinking skills, departing from traditional approaches. Results indicate that mind mapping significantly improves knowledge retention compared to conventional methods. Hence, we strongly recommend mind mapping as an integral learning technique in nursing education; this will impact on enhancing knowledge acquisition, retention, and critical thinking skills among nursing students, surpassing the outcomes of traditional methods.

Indexed as

Educationeducational technologyinformation storage and retrievallearningnursing

Identifiers

PMID39679048
PMCPMC11639541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.