ReviewJournal of education and health promotion2024
Exploring the scope and utility of peer observation by medical students: A narrative review.
Review in Journal of education and health promotion, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As medical knowledge continues to advance each day and there are multiple competencies that need to be acquired by undergraduate students, it becomes quite challenging for them to become competent within the period of training. The purpose of the current review is to explore the process of peer observation, identify the benefits attributed to peer observation, and explore various strategies to measure the impact of peer observation in medical education. An extensive search of all materials related to the topic was carried out on the PubMed and Google Scholar search engines and a total of 25 articles were selected based on their suitability with the current review objectives. Keywords used in the search include peer observation in the title alone only (viz. peer observation [ti] AND teaching [ti]; peer observation [ti] AND feedback [ti]; peer observation [ti] AND faculty [ti]; peer observation [ti] AND evaluation [ti]; peer observation [ti]). The approach of peer observation by medical students has been acknowledged as one of the important tools to improve the teaching and learning experiences by making everyone accountable. The success of peer observation in any medical college depends on the groundwork that has been carried out prior to its introduction. To maximize the benefit of peer observation in medical education for both stakeholders, we must take specific measures to conduct effective observations. In conclusion, peer observation by medical students is an effective approach to empower students as educators and develop a culture of continuous improvement in the institution. Acknowledging the merits of peer observation, the need of the hour is to adopt a systematic approach to ensure its successful planning and implementation in medical colleges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.