ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2024
Effectiveness of Heart Failure Nursing Protocol (HF-NP) on quality of life of patients with heart failure.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Timing of intervention in cardiogenic shock management: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Review
- Effect of a nurse-led follow-up program on the health-related quality of life among patients with heart failure: A randomized clinical trial.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of a comprehensive therapeutic milieu on quality of life and level of stress among patients with heart failure - An experimental study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- Effect of TR Band™ radial artery compression device-screw and air types on bleeding severity after radial arterial line removal in open-heart surgery: A randomized controlled clinical trial.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective management of heart failure (HF) requires an integrated approach involving pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. Available evidence shows that patients benefit from adjunctive therapies along with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). Still, there is an inadequacy in the use of the best available evidence and the self-management of symptoms by the patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a Heart Failure Nursing Protocol (HF-NP) on selected parameters, that is, symptoms, self-care adequacy, episodes of hospitalizations, depression, exercise capacity, medication adherence, activities of daily living (ADLs), and quality of life (QOL) of the HF patients. MATERIAL AND
methodsA pre-experimental study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in Northern India. A total of 101 patients were enrolled using a convenient sampling technique. Participants were trained individually through demonstrations and educational sessions about self-management of HF at home. An informational booklet was given to all the participants consisting of information about HF, dietary instructions, individual exercise schedules based on the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, identification of worsening symptoms, daily monitoring of vital parameters, and self-management of HF at home. Telephonic encouragement was provided on day 15, 1 month, and 3 months of baseline visits. The data were checked for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and analyzed using a paired
resultsThere was significant improvement in outcomes, such as breathing difficulty (
conclusionHF-NP was effective in improving HF outcomes. It can be used to train patients and their family members regarding the debilitating illness, after doing a large study, and it can be incorporated into the health policy later.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.