ReviewDigital health
Visual analysis of research trends and hotspots in wearable electronic devices in the medical field: A bibliometric study.
Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Continuous Temperature Monitoring via Wearable Devices for Fever or Infection Management in Acute Care Hospitals: Scoping Review of Clinical Implementation and Data Analytics.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- Article
- Perceived Risk and Fashion on the Intention to Adopt Wireless Earbuds in the United States Using a Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling Approach: Empirical Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Healthcare services and functionalities need comprehensive upgrades, and advancements in information technology have driven research in wearable electronic devices (WDs), making them critical tools for this purpose. Objective: To conduct a systematic bibliometric analysis of WDs in the medical field and understand research trends. Methods: A literature search of articles related to WDs in the medical field was conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) from 2013 to 2023. Articles were analyzed using CiteSpace 6.1.R6. Results: Publications on WDs have increased yearly since 2014, peaking in 2021. The United States leads with 935 articles. PLOS One is the top journal, and Bland et al. have the highest citation frequencies. Hot topics include mobile apps, phones, and neural networks, with research on physical activity, sleep monitoring, and atrial fibrillation. Conclusions: This study identifies key journals, countries, institutions, and authors in WDs research, highlighting trends and global interest in health monitoring and assessment. The United States leads in research, with future trends focusing on neural network monitoring, accuracy improvements, cloud storage, and advancements in healthcare management systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.