Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39678999›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in infectious disease

De-implementation strategy to reduce overtreatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in the emergency department: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial.

Tessa M Z X K van Horrik, Bart J Laan, Janneke E Stalenhoef, Cees van Nieuwkoop, Joppe B Saanen, Caroline Schneeberger, Eefje Jong, Suzanne E Geerlings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in infectious disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tessa M Z X K van HorrikInternal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3496-2203
Bart J LaanInternal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Janneke E StalenhoefInternal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, OLVG, Amsterdam, North-Holland, the Netherlands.
Cees van NieuwkoopInternal Medicine, Haga Teaching Hospital, South-Holland, the Netherlands.
Joppe B SaanenEmergency Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, North-Holland, the Netherlands.
Caroline SchneebergerCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Eefje JongInternal Medicine, Meander Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Suzanne E GeerlingsInternal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is the presence of bacteria in the urine of patients without symptoms of a urinary tract infection. Generally, treating ASB is not beneficial. Objective: We aimed to reduce overtreatment of ASB in the emergency department (ED) through a multifaceted de-implementation strategy. Design: A stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial. Methods: We performed our study in five EDs in the Netherlands from December 2020 to December 2021. Adult patients with urine cultures obtained during ED presentation were screened for inclusion and we excluded patients with indications for antibiotic therapy. The de-implementation strategy included education, reminders and competitive feedback on baseline results. The primary endpoint was patients with ASB treated with antibiotics. Secondary endpoints included the treatment duration and the number of urine tests ordered (urinalyses and urine cultures) in the ED per 1000 adult patients. Results: In total, 6837 urine cultures were screened. ASB was present in 224/3289 (7%) and 201/3548 (6%) patients, from whom 65/224 (29%) and 46/201 (23%) were inappropriately treated with antibiotics in the baseline and intervention period, respectively (adjusted odds ratio 1.20, 95% CI 0.56-2.62, Conclusion: Diagnostic stewardship by our de-implementation strategy reduced the number of urinalyses ordered and treatment duration in the ED, but we found no significant reduction in overtreatment of ASB. Trial registration: The trial was registered at https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/25918, on 17-12-2019, registration number NL8242. The first participants were enrolled on 01-12-2020.

Indexed as

antimicrobial stewardshipasymptomatic bacteriuriaquality improvementurinary tract infections

Identifiers

PMID39678999
PMCPMC11645715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.