Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39678931›Full record

ArticleChemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society2024

Manipulating Backbone Planarity of Ester Functionalized Conjugated Polymer Constitutional Isomer Derivatives Blended with Molecular Acceptors for Controlling Photovoltaic Properties.

Sina Sabury, Austin L Jones, Nora Schopp, Sadisha Nanayakkara, Thomas P Chaney, Veaceslav Coropceanu, Seth R Marder, Michael F Toney, Jean-Luc Brédas, Thuc-Quyen Nguyen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sina SaburySchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Center for Organic Photonics and Electronics, Georgia Tech Polymer Network, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Austin L JonesSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Center for Organic Photonics and Electronics, Georgia Tech Polymer Network, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Nora SchoppCenter for Polymers and Organic Solids, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States.
Sadisha NanayakkaraDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0041, United States.
Thomas P ChaneyMaterials Science and Engineering Program, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8123-7215
Veaceslav CoropceanuDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0041, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1693-2315
Seth R MarderMaterials Science and Engineering Program, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.
Michael F ToneyMaterials Science and Engineering Program, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7513-1166
Jean-Luc BrédasDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0041, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7278-4471
Thuc-Quyen NguyenCenter for Polymers and Organic Solids, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8364-7517
John R ReynoldsSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Center for Organic Photonics and Electronics, Georgia Tech Polymer Network, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7417-4869

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exploring both electron donor and acceptor phase components in bulk heterojunction structures has contributed to the advancement of organic photovoltaics (OPV) realizing power conversion efficiencies reaching 20%. Being able to control backbone planarity of the donor polymer, while understanding its effects on the polymer conformation and photophysical properties, fosters the groundwork for further achievements in this realm. In this report, three isomeric PM7 derivatives are designed and synthesized where the benzodithiophene-4,8-dione structure is replaced by a quaterthiophene bridge carrying two ester moieties. The placement of these two ester groups varies among three configurational isomers, which ultimately influences the chain conformations and aggregation behavior of each polymer. Specifically, PM7-D3 has ester groups attached to the inner positions of the outer thiophenes showing moderate solution aggregation; PM7-D4 has ester groups attached to the inner positions of the inner thiophenes featuring a twisted backbone with no solution aggregation behavior; and PM7-D5 has ester groups attached to the outer positions of the inner thiophenes with strong solution aggregation. PM7-D5 shows the highest average power conversion efficiency of 11.4% paired with the molecular acceptor L8-BO. In addition, the differences among the polymer backbones are expressed by their state energies and carrier mobility in the corresponding fabricated OPV devices.

Identifiers

PMID39678931
PMCPMC11635973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.