Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39678920›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2025

Benefit of Avasopasem Manganese on Severe Oral Mucositis in Head and Neck Cancer in the ROMAN Trial: Unplanned Secondary Analysis.

Carryn Anderson, Samuel Salvaggio, Mickaël De Backer, Jean-Christophe Chiem, Gary Walker, Deborah Saunders, Christopher M Lee, Neal Dunlap, Eugene Kennedy, Robert Beardsley and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Radiomitigators: Breakthroughs in Post-Radiation Recovery.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Carryn AndersonDepartment of Radiation Oncology University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
Samuel SalvaggioInternational Drug Development Institute (IDDI), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Mickaël De BackerInternational Drug Development Institute (IDDI), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Jean-Christophe ChiemInternational Drug Development Institute (IDDI), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Gary WalkerBanner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona.
Deborah SaundersNortheast Cancer Centre of Health Sciences North, Health Sciences North, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, Canada.
Christopher M LeeCancer Care Northwest, Spokane, Washington.
Neal DunlapUniversity of Louisville/James Graham Brown Cancer Center, Louisville, Kentucky.
Eugene KennedyGalera Therapeutics, Inc, Malvern, Pennsylvania.
Robert BeardsleyGalera Therapeutics, Inc, Malvern, Pennsylvania.
Benton SchoenGalera Therapeutics, Inc, Malvern, Pennsylvania.
Marc BuyseInternational Drug Development Institute (IDDI), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Oral mucositis (OM) is a debilitating side effect of cisplatin and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with head and neck cancer. The phase 3 ROMAN trial showed avasopasem manganese (AVA) significantly decreased individual endpoints of incidence and duration of severe oral mucositis (SOM, World Health Organization [WHO] grade 3-4), with nominal decrease in severity (WHO grade 4) and significant increase in the delay in onset of SOM. We sought to determine the Net Treatment Benefit (NTB) of AVA versus placebo (PBO) using the generalized pairwise comparisons (GPC) method. Methods and Materials: GPC is a statistical method that permits simultaneous analysis of several prioritized outcomes, comparing all possible pairs of a patient in the active (ie, AVA) group and a patient from the control (ie, PBO) group. NTB is the net benefit across all the outcomes for AVA compared to PBO. Key clinically relevant outcomes from ROMAN were prioritized: (1) WHO grade 4 OM incidence; (2) SOM incidence; (3) days of SOM; (4) days to SOM onset, with 7 days difference defined as the clinical relevance threshold for SOM days and SOM onset. Results: GPC analysis of 407 patients (AVA = 241, placebo = 166) stratified by cisplatin schedule and treatment setting resulted in 13,969 pairwise comparisons. AVA showed statistically significant net benefit on all 4 key outcomes with a 53.9% probability that AVA would benefit patients versus a 35.0% probability that PBO would; the difference between these probabilities was a NTB of 18.9% ( Conclusions: This GPC analysis shows compelling evidence from the ROMAN trial of AVA's clinical benefit across key parameters of SOM burden.

Identifiers

PMID39678920
PMCPMC11638593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.