ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Surgical outcomes and learning curve of complex versus simple segmentectomy for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: an initial experience of 100 cases of a single experienced surgeon.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Perioperative Outcomes of Complex Versus Simple Segmentectomy Via Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Lung Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Upfront uniportal anatomical segmentectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis on the early postoperative outcomes of complex and simple resections.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Article
- Preoperative simulation of uniportal thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy achieves equivalent accuracy of surgical resection margins for palpable and impalpable tumors.Journal of visualized surgery · 2025Article
- Surgical technique for uniportal VATS right S10 segmentectomy with the pulmonary ligament approach, performing the intersegmental division last.Journal of visualized surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Complex segmentectomy for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) remains controversial due to procedural complexity and the risk of increased complications, unlike multiportal VATS. Demonstrating the perioperative results and proficiency of individual surgeon is believed to influence future dissemination for uniportal VATS. In this study, we aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes and learning curves of complex versus simple segmentectomy for uniportal VATS. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all patients who had an elective uniportal VATS segmentectomy between July 2018 and June 2023. We documented our initial experience with 100 consecutive segmentectomy cases. A single board-certified experienced surgeon performed all procedures. The perioperative outcomes of the complex (n=45) and simple (n=55) segmentectomy groups were compared using propensity score matching and the cumulative sum technique. Results: Using propensity score matching, 29 patients were chosen from each group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in perioperative outcomes. The initial learning curve for simple segmentectomy was completed after 20 cases, while that for complex segmentectomy was completed after 11 cases. Conclusions: Uniportal VATS complex segmentectomy was safe and comparable to simple segmentectomy in terms of perioperative outcomes and learning curves in an experienced surgeon. Uniportal VATS complex segmentectomy should be considered a viable surgical option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.