ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2024
Research progress in interventional therapy for acute intermediate-high-risk and high-risk pulmonary embolism.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification of disease subtypes associated with prognosis in patients with intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism based on hierarchical cluster analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute pulmonary embolism (APE) has a high mortality rate worldwide. The cause of death from pulmonary embolism (PE) is predominantly progressive right heart failure, which is common in intermediate-high-risk and high-risk patients. The latest guidelines recommend reperfusion thrombolytic therapy for high-risk patients, but it is rarely practiced clinically, given the high rate of intracranial hemorrhage. Moreover, the optimal treatment for intermediate-risk patients remains undetermined. With the development of technology, a series of endovascular interventional treatments are widely used in patients with intermediate-high-risk or high-risk PE, such as standard catheter-directed thrombolysis (SCDT), ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis (USAT), pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PM-CDT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Current studies have shown that interventional therapy can effectively improve right heart function and reduce the incidence of cerebral hemorrhage. Future research should mainly focus on screening patients who benefit from interventional therapy, reducing mortality, and improving long-term sequelae. This article aimed to review these treatment devices and provide an update on the research progress related to interventional therapy for PE. In addition, we introduce a risk stratification assessment for APE in the updated guidelines and provide an overview of risk indicators and APE scores for judging prognosis. Finally, we discuss the long-term outcomes of APE in combination with interventional therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.