ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2024
The TNM classification of lung cancer-a historic perspective.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Tumor stage, squamous histology and male sex predict positive resection margins in non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing anatomical resection-a retrospective study from a high-volume thoracic surgery unit.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-derived three-dimensional tumor volume improves prognostic stratification in breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) Compared with Targeted EBUS-TBNA for Mediastinal Staging of Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Is surgery with curative intent feasible in old and very old patients with non-small cell lung cancer? - Experience of a certified lung cancer center over one decade.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
- The prognostic value ofAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Breaking: The New 9Thoracic research and practice · 2026Article
- Article
- Natural course of lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as ground-glass nodules: invasiveness assessment based on growth evaluation.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Differences Between the 8th and 9th Editions of the TNM Staging System in Predicting Mortality in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Staged with EBUS.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- COPD Severity as an Independent Predictor of Long-Term Survival in Operable Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis from a High-Volume Thoracic Surgery Center.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developed by Pierre F. Denoix in the mid-20th century as a clinical classification of anatomic tumour extent, the tumour, node, and metastasis (TNM) classification was adopted by the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). The first lung cancer classification was published as a brochure in 1966 by the UICC, and 2 years later, the UICC published the first edition of the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.