ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Long-survival of a patient with esophageal cancer benefited from comprehensive treatment and MDT: a case report.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping Two Decades of Research on Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Esophageal Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visual Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Advances in the treatment of postoperative anastomotic strictures in esophageal cancer a comparative analysis of the efficacy of endoscopic versus interventional dilatation.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Review
- Development of a risk-stratified follow-up strategy based on early and late recurrence risk factors in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after definitive chemoradiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Association between treatment decisions and survival outcomes in lung cancer patients under a multidisciplinary team model: the impact of MDT-recommended treatment plans on treatment completion rates, survival time, and treatment conversion.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are emerging as important drugs for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC). Yet, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) may be a major obstacle for these population. Multidisciplinary team (MDT) is an efficient way to deal with such conditions. The aim of this study is to report a case of a stage III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patient who achieved long-term survival through comprehensive treatment and MDT management, despite multiple irAEs. Case Description: A 67-year-old man was diagnosed with stage III ESCC (cT4N1M0) in January 2021. After 2 cycles of initial immuno-chemotherapy with good efficiency, he suffered from grade 3 immune-related hepatitis (IRH) and recovered after steroid therapy. Then radical radiotherapy began as planned. However, he got pneumonia and common antibiotics and steroid showed no effect. Finally, NGS-based pathogen detection identified cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in his sputum. Ganciclovir was prescribed to him and his condition turned better soon. During a five-month period of anti-infectious therapy and follow-up, there was no anti-tumor treatment. However, the patient's esophageal lesion was evaluated as having a partial response (PR) on computed tomography (CT) scan and cancer cells transformed to high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia through gastroscopy. He underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and began a five-month follow-up period. When dysplasia recurred locally, the MDT members carefully restarted ICIs since he had fully recovered from previous irAEs and we believed he benefited from long-term responses to ICIs. Despite experiencing a third irAE, that is, adrenocortical insufficiency with mild symptoms, the patient still greatly benefited from ICIs. After being diagnosed as stage III EC for about 35 months, the patient's disease was still evaluated as clinical no evidence of disease (NED). Conclusions: EC patients with irAEs who are well managed benefited from ICIs. MDT is crucial in the management of comprehensive treatment for EC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.