ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2024
Rationale and strategies for improving glycaemic control in diabetic patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diabetes mellitus is associated with short-term postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing vats lobectomy for lung cancer: a 7-year retrospective analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Contemporary perspectives on metabolic surgery for type 2 diabetes: surgical techniques, outcomes, and complications.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: The global prevalence of diabetes mellitus has markedly risen in recent years. Consequently, there has been a rise in the number of patients with diabetes undergoing cardiac surgery. Despite the existence of national and international guidelines to improve surgical outcomes in patients with diabetes, perioperative diabetes management optimisation remains inadequate resulting in these patients experiencing increased rates of surgical morbidity and mortality. This review aims to evaluate outcomes following cardiac surgery in patients with diabetes and assess strategies to enhance preoperative and perioperative optimization and postoperative outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed for articles concerning perioperative management of diabetes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery as well as postoperative complications related to diabetes in addition to interventions utilised to optimize outcomes. Key Content and Findings: Principle findings were extracted and synthesized. Patients with diabetes undergoing cardiac surgery exhibit increased perioperative complications, higher in-hospital mortality rates and inferior long-term survival. A key facilitator is specifically poor glycemic control, with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) serving as a predictive marker. However, measuring preoperative HbA1c is not routine, and there is no established threshold for deferring elective surgery. Preoperatively, emphasis should be placed on lowering the patient's HbA1c through optimized medical management and continuous glucose monitoring. Intraoperatively, continuous insulin infusion therapy is recommended alongside postoperative continuation for critically ill patients. Prompt resumption of the patient's routine medications post-surgery is also necessary. Conclusions: Optimal glycemic control, both pre-, intra- and perioperatively, correlates with improved outcomes that are comparable to those without diabetes. Targeted efforts are warranted for patients with diabetes undergoing cardiac surgery to ensure long-term benefits for the patients and healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.