ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Analysis of pulmonary complications and predicted postoperative pulmonary function in oncologic lung resections.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Effects of a lung recruitment maneuver combined with individualized positive end-expiratory pressure on postoperative pulmonary complications and perioperative hemodynamics in hypertensive patients undergoing pulmonary resection].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026Trial
- Comorbidities as predictors of postoperative pulmonary complications after lung cancer surgery.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Perioperative ΔNLR and ΔPNI independently predict postoperative pulmonary complications in non-small cell lung cancer: a difference analysis-based nomogram.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- Predictive factors of patient length of stay with multiloculated pleural effusion after medical thoracoscopy: single-center retrospective cohort study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) represent a significant source of morbidity and mortality in surgical patients. Measurement of predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in the first second (ppo FEV1) may allow for reliable prediction of PPCs and perioperative planning. This study aimed to determine if impaired ppo FEV1 is associated with increased risk of PPCs following oncologic lung resection. Methods: Patients who underwent elective pulmonary resection at The Ottawa Hospital between 2008 and 2018 were evaluated. The presence and severity of PPCs as defined by the Ottawa Thoracic Morbidity & Mortality system were analyzed. The incidence of PPCs was evaluated based on different ppo FEV1 cut-off values (40%, 50%, and 60%), and a multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of PPCs. Results: Of 1,949 included patients, a thoracoscopic approach (64.4%) was most frequently utilized, and lobectomies represented the most common procedure (60.5%). All cut-off ppo FEV1 values of <40% (P<0.001), <50% (P<0.001), and <60% (P=0.004) were associated with more frequent PPCs (13.0%, 11.6%, and 7.6%, respectively), while only ppo FEV1 <50% showed differences in both minor (P<0.001) and major (P=0.005) PPCs. With ppo FEV1 <50%, differences in PPCs were demonstrated specifically in both thoracoscopic (P=0.03) and open (P=0.003) procedures. On multivariable analysis, ppo FEV1 <50% (P=0.03) and need for operative conversion (P<0.001) independently predicted PPCs. Conclusions: Routine assessment of ppo FEV1 is a practical strategy to identify patients at increased risk of developing PPCs, and can identify candidates for preoperative optimization and postoperative pulmonary support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.