ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Investigation of pure lung microbiota in patients with lung cancer after eliminating upper airway contamination: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Causality of genetically determined gut microbiota on lung cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While the relationship between gut microbiota and gastrointestinal cancer has been elucidated, the relationship between lung microbiota and lung cancer remains unclear. Previous study findings are inconclusive due to the possibility of contamination by upper airway microbiota in samples obtained from the oropharynx, such as saliva and sputum, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) collected during bronchoscopy. Therefore, this study aimed to detect pure lung microbiota in patients with lung cancer using BALF samples from resected lung specimens. Additionally, we aimed to evaluate the lung microbiota to clarify their relationship with lung cancer and aid in postoperative pneumonia (POP) prevention and treatment. Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled patients with clinically suspected lung cancer who underwent surgical resection at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Suwa Hospital, between April 2020 and March 2022. BALF from resected lung specimens collected under sterile conditions were used for high-throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS) and bacterial culture analyses. Pure lung microbiota were identified, and their abundance ratio was analyzed. Additionally, we performed α-diversity analysis and explored the relationship between microbiota and POP by comparing our findings with previous literature. Results: Among samples collected from 54 included cases, bacteria were detected in 13 samples (24.1%) via bacterial culture and in all samples via NGS. Candidate Phylum OD1 bacteria (OD1) was present in a large proportion of samples (phylum level). The major bacteria genera, with a relative abundance ratio (each bacterial read amount/total bacterial read amount) >1% in at least one sample, included Conclusions: Our lung microbiota sampling method eliminated contamination from upper airway microbiota, allowing detection of pure lung microbiota. This study provides baseline data on pure lung microbiota and highlights the need for further research to explore the role of OD1 in lung cancer, which was previously unreported in lung microbiota. Although the pathogens of POP can be aspirated post-hospitalization, they could already exist as lung microbiota pre-hospitalization. Further investigation is needed to substantiate our results and hypothesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.