Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39678822›Full record

ArticleCurrent zoology2024

Comparative foraging behavior of 3 heron species in small standing-water ecosystems in the arid zone of Oman.

Zbigniew Kasprzykowski, Artur Golawski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current zoology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zbigniew KasprzykowskiFaculty of Sciences, University of Siedlce, Prusa 14, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland.
Artur GolawskiFaculty of Sciences, University of Siedlce, Prusa 14, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The composition of assemblages, diet and behavior of waterbird species with similar ecological features are important aspects in the functioning of aquatic ecosystems. Closely related animal species often share resources such as space and food in ways that reduce competition, but if the diets of different species strongly overlap, interspecific competition may intensify. This analysis examined behavioral data relating to Great Egret, Little Egret, and Squacco Heron to explore their foraging efficiencies in rich aquatic habitats in an arid zone during post-breeding movements. The fieldwork was carried out in small estuaries of a Wadi on the southern coast of Oman. The frequency of interactions was the highest in Squacco Heron and the lowest in Great Egret. However, the differences in the numbers of inter- and intra-specific interactions between the 3 species were significant. Activity indices calculated for a 5-min period, i.e., the number of interactions (interaction index) and times of flying and walking (movement index) differed among the 3 species. The number of successful attacks was the highest in Squacco Heron, while the foraging effectiveness of Great Egret and Little Egret was similar. GLM analysis showed that only the movement index was significant, as it had a positive impact on individual foraging success. Great Egret caught more fish than the other 2 heron species which, in turn, caught a greater number of smaller prey items, mostly invertebrates. This study shows that heron species in the same rich habitat employ different foraging tactics. In comparison to the other two heron species, the foraging tactics of Squacco Heron seem to be the most susceptible to competition. However, its greater mobility and using different foraging tactics, enhance its foraging success.

Indexed as

competitionfood nicheforaging successhunting tacticsinteractions

Identifiers

PMID39678822
PMCPMC11634682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.