Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39678754›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of dermatology

Seronegative and Low Seropositive Treatment-Naive Secondary Syphilis in India: A Cross Sectional Study.

Aparajita Ghosh, Saumya Panda, Surjyamukhi Bhattacharyya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of dermatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aparajita GhoshFrom the Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, KPC Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Saumya PandaDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, JIMS Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Surjyamukhi BhattacharyyaFrom the Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, KPC Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The non-treponemal tests like VDRL and RPR hold an important place in the diagnosis of syphilis. In many countries, these tests are used for screening, with positive results being subsequently confirmed by treponemal or specific tests like TPHA or FTA-ABS. Recent observations of low-titer VDRL or RPR positivity (<1:8) or negative results in patients with clinically active syphilis are becoming a cause for concern especially in the backdrop of a resurgence of the disease. Such a scenario might undermine the usefulness of VDRL or RPR as effective screening test and for treatment monitoring. We studied the titers of non-treponemal serological test (VDRL) in non-HIV-positive, untreated cases of secondary syphilis (diagnosed clinically and confirmed serologically with specific treponemal tests like TPHA or FTA-ABS). It was an OPD-based cross-sectional study, which included patients presenting with muco-cutaneous lesions suggestive of secondary syphilis, confirmed serologically with positive specific treponemal tests, who were seronegative for HIV1 and 2 and had not received treatment with injectable benzathine penicillin. Their VDRL titers were noted. Information regarding duration of lesions and any previous genital ulcer was obtained, and additional information was sought regarding any medications taken during the last two months. Nineteen patients (12 males, 4 females, and 3 transgender individuals) between the ages of 18 and 46 years were included in the study. Ten of these cases (52.63%) had a VDRL titer of less than 1:8 (non-reactive in 5 patients, titer of 1:4 in 5 patients). Among the remaining nine cases, a titer of 1:8 was observed in six, 1: 16 in two, and 1:32 in one case. Our observations raise concerns regarding the possibility that a significant number of patients with active syphilis and potential to transmit the disease are being left untreated because of low or negative titers in the screening tests. This may account for the slow resurgence of syphilis as documented by increase in case rates and incidence of congenital syphilis in different parts of the world.

Indexed as

Secondary syphilistreponemal testsVDRL titer

Identifiers

PMID39678754
PMCPMC11642461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.