Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39678737›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2024

Random forest algorithm identifies miRNA signatures for breast cancer detection and classification from patient urine samples.

Jochen Maurer, Matthias Rübner, Chao-Chung Kuo, Birgit Klein, Julia Franzen, Julia Wittenborn, Tomas Kupec, Laila Najjari, Peter Fasching, Elmar Stickeler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jochen MaurerClinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3962-3128
Matthias RübnerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Chao-Chung KuoGenomics Facility, Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF), RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Birgit KleinClinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Julia FranzenGenomics Facility, Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF), RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Julia WittenbornClinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Tomas KupecClinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Laila NajjariClinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Peter FaschingDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Elmar StickelerClinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objectives: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women, with one in eight women suffering from this disease in her lifetime. The implementation of centrally organized mammography screening for women between 50 and 69 years of age was a major step in the direction of early detection. However, the participation rate reaches approximately 50% of the eligible women, one reason being the painful compression of the breast, cited as a major issue for not participating in this very important program. Therefore, focusing current research on less painful and less invasive techniques for the detection of breast cancer is highly clinically relevant. Liquid biopsies offer this option by detection of distinct molecules such as microRNAs (miRNAs) or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) or disseminated tumor cells. Design and methods: Here, we present the first proof-of-concept approach for sequencing miRNAs in female urine to detect breast cancer and, subsequently, intrinsic subtype-specific miRNA patterns and implement in this regard a novel random forest algorithm. To this end, we performed miRNA sequencing on 82 urine samples, 32 samples from breast cancer patients (9× luminal A, 8× luminal B, 9× triple-negative, and 6× HER2) and 50 healthy control samples. Results and conclusion: Using a random forest algorithm, we identified a signature of 275 miRNAs that allows the detection of invasive breast cancer in urine. Furthermore, we identified distinct miRNA expression patterns for the major intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer, specifically luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched, and triple-negative breast cancer. This experimental approach specifically validates miRNA sequencing as a technique for breast cancer detection in urine samples and opens the door to a new, easy, and painless procedure for different breast cancer-related medical procedures such as screening but also treatment monitoring.

Indexed as

breast cancerclassificationexpression patternHER2luminal Aluminal BmiRNA sequencingscreeningTNBCurine

Identifiers

PMID39678737
PMCPMC11645719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.