ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2024
Clinical-Radiomics Nomogram Model Based on CT Angiography for Prediction of Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture: A Multicenter Study.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Radiomics for differentiating ruptured intracranial aneurysms: overview, methodological quality evaluation using METRICS and RQS, and feature transportability validation using independent multi-center dataset.European radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting early rupture and rebleeding risk after intracranial aneurysm embolization.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Risk estimation of intracranial aneurysm rupture is critical in determining treatment strategy. There is a scarcity of multicenter studies on the predictive power of clinical-radiomics models for aneurysm rupture. This study aims to develop a clinical-radiomics model and explore its additional value in the discrimination of aneurysm rupture. Methods: A total of 516 aneurysms, including 273 (52.9%) with ruptured aneurysms, were retrospectively enrolled from four hospitals between January 2019 and August 2020. Relevant clinical features were collected, and radiomic characteristics associated with aneurysm were extracted. Subsequently, three models, including a clinical model, a radiomics model, and a clinical-radiomics model were constructed using multivariate logistic regression analysis to effectively classify aneurysm rupture. The performance of models was analyzed through operating characteristic curves, decision curve, and calibration curves analysis. Different models' comparison used DeLong tests. To offer an understandable and intuitive scoring system for assessing rupture risk, we developed a comprehensive nomogram based on the developed model. Results: Three clinical risk factors and fourteen radiomics features were explored to establish three models. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for the radiomics model was 0.775 (95% CI,0.719-0.830), 0.752 (95% CI,0.663-0.841), 0.747 (95% CI,0.658-0.835) in the training, internal and external test datasets, respectively. The AUC for clinical model was 0.802 (95% CI, 0.749-0.854), 0.736 (95% CI, 0.644-0.828), 0.789 (95% CI, 0.709-0.870) in these three sets, respectively. The clinical-radiomics model showed an AUC of 0.880 (95% CI,0.840-0.920), 0.807 (95% CI,0.728-0.887), 0.815 (95% CI,0.740-0.891) in three datasets respectively. Compared with the radiomics and clinical models, the clinical-radiomics model demonstrated better diagnostic performance (DeLong' test P < 0.05). Conclusion: The clinical-radiomics model represents a promising approach for predicting rupture of intracranial aneurysms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.