Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39678712›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2024

Clinical-Radiomics Nomogram Model Based on CT Angiography for Prediction of Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture: A Multicenter Study.

Xiu-Fen Jia, Yong-Chun Chen, Kui-Kui Zheng, Dong-Qin Zhu, Chao Chen, Jinjin Liu, Yun-Jun Yang, Chuan-Ting Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiu-Fen JiaDepartment of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, 250021, People's Republic of China.
Yong-Chun ChenDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, People's Republic of China.
Kui-Kui ZhengDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, People's Republic of China.
Dong-Qin ZhuDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, People's Republic of China.
Chao ChenDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, People's Republic of China.
Jinjin LiuDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, People's Republic of China.
Yun-Jun YangDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-2080-2417
Chuan-Ting LiDepartment of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, 250021, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Risk estimation of intracranial aneurysm rupture is critical in determining treatment strategy. There is a scarcity of multicenter studies on the predictive power of clinical-radiomics models for aneurysm rupture. This study aims to develop a clinical-radiomics model and explore its additional value in the discrimination of aneurysm rupture. Methods: A total of 516 aneurysms, including 273 (52.9%) with ruptured aneurysms, were retrospectively enrolled from four hospitals between January 2019 and August 2020. Relevant clinical features were collected, and radiomic characteristics associated with aneurysm were extracted. Subsequently, three models, including a clinical model, a radiomics model, and a clinical-radiomics model were constructed using multivariate logistic regression analysis to effectively classify aneurysm rupture. The performance of models was analyzed through operating characteristic curves, decision curve, and calibration curves analysis. Different models' comparison used DeLong tests. To offer an understandable and intuitive scoring system for assessing rupture risk, we developed a comprehensive nomogram based on the developed model. Results: Three clinical risk factors and fourteen radiomics features were explored to establish three models. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for the radiomics model was 0.775 (95% CI,0.719-0.830), 0.752 (95% CI,0.663-0.841), 0.747 (95% CI,0.658-0.835) in the training, internal and external test datasets, respectively. The AUC for clinical model was 0.802 (95% CI, 0.749-0.854), 0.736 (95% CI, 0.644-0.828), 0.789 (95% CI, 0.709-0.870) in these three sets, respectively. The clinical-radiomics model showed an AUC of 0.880 (95% CI,0.840-0.920), 0.807 (95% CI,0.728-0.887), 0.815 (95% CI,0.740-0.891) in three datasets respectively. Compared with the radiomics and clinical models, the clinical-radiomics model demonstrated better diagnostic performance (DeLong' test P < 0.05). Conclusion: The clinical-radiomics model represents a promising approach for predicting rupture of intracranial aneurysms.

Indexed as

computed tomography angiographyintracranial aneurysmnomogramsradiomicsrupture

Identifiers

PMID39678712
PMCPMC11645942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.