Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39678667›Full record

ArticleNanophotonics (Berlin, Germany)2024

Extracting accurate light-matter couplings from disordered polaritons.

Kai Schwennicke, Noel C Giebink, Joel Yuen-Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Long-lived polaritonic coherence and polaron decoupling effects in 2D electronic spectra.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Polaritonic quantum matter.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Strong Coupling of Organic Molecules 2023 (SCOM23).Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kai SchwennickeDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Noel C GiebinkDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, and Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3798-5830
Joel Yuen-ZhouDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8701-8793

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vacuum Rabi splitting (VRS) in molecular polaritons stands as a fundamental measure of collective light-matter coupling. Despite its significance, the impact of molecular disorder on VRS is not fully understood yet. This study delves into the complexities of VRS amidst various distributions and degrees of disorder. Our analysis provides precise analytical expressions for linear absorption, transmission, and reflection spectra, along with a "sum" rule, offering a straightforward protocol for extracting accurate collective light-matter coupling values from experimental data. Importantly, our study cautions against directly translating large VRS to the onset of ultrastrong coupling regime. Furthermore, for rectangular disorder, we witness the emergence of narrow side bands alongside a broad central peak, indicating an extended coherence lifetime even in the presence of substantial disorder. These findings not only enhance our understanding of VRS in disordered molecular systems but also open avenues for achieving prolonged coherence lifetimes between the cavity and molecules via the interplay of collective coupling and disorder.

Indexed as

disordermolecular polaritonsstrong light-matter coupling

Identifiers

PMID39678667
PMCPMC11636428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.