Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39678627›Full record

ReviewGlomerular diseases

Immunofluorescence Use and Techniques in Glomerular Diseases: A Review.

Nidia Messias

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Glomerular diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nidia MessiasDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Immunofluorescence (IF) studies play an essential role in the evaluation of medical renal biopsies. Particularly, in the study of renal glomerular diseases, where it provides fundamental data for the diagnosis, classification, and etiology of the glomerular pathologies. Diverse techniques may be used to optimize the utilization of IF studies, from variations on the test methodologies to expertise on the interpretation of the results and knowledge of potential pitfalls. Summary: This manuscript presents a brief review on the history of IF and its utilization in kidney pathology, followed by a description of the IF methods, including the use of IF on paraffin-embedded tissue (paraffin IF), and other novel techniques. Guidelines on how to best report IF findings are reviewed, along with a description of antibodies commonly used in glomerular diseases, highlighting their distribution within the normal kidney and potential pitfalls in interpretation. Finally, the use and interpretation of IF are discussed in more detail in individual entities on a range of glomerular diseases. Key Messages: IF is crucial for interpretation of renal biopsies and diagnosis of glomerular diseases. Knowledge of IF techniques, alternative procedures, its use and proper interpretation is essential for optimal utilization of IF in renal pathology, and this review proposes to serve as a simplified and practical guide on this topic.

Indexed as

ImmunofluorescenceKidneyRenal pathologyReview

Identifiers

PMID39678627
PMCPMC11644094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.