ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024
Prognostic value of peripheral blood fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prognostic value of peripheral blood fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio in pancreatic cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Prognostic and clinicopathological role of pretreatment fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR) in patients with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Prognostic and clinicopathological value of fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Prognostic role of fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio in patients with gynecological cancers: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Pretreatment emotional distress and peripheral biomarkers predict immune checkpoint inhibitor response in people with advanced inoperable gastroesophageal cancer.Communications medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the expression and prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC).
methodsThis retrospective study included 118 cases diagnosed with metastatic or locally advanced PC who received systemic chemotherapy at People's Hospital of Deyang City from January 2018 to February 2021. Data and blood indicators were collected from patients, and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), NLR, and FAR were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine optimal cutoff values. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted, and the Log-rank test was employed for intergroup survival analysis. Prognostic factors affecting the prognosis of PC patients were identified using multiple Cox regression analysis.
resultsThe optimal cutoff values of FAR and NLR were 0.1 and 3.28 respectively, with areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.776 and 0.804, respectively. Significant differences were observed between the low FAR and high FAR groups in terms of tumor invasion into large blood vessels, distant metastasis, and pre-treatment NLR (all P < 0.05). Similarly, significant differences were observed between the low NLR and high NLR groups in terms of distant metastasis, pre-treatment FAR, and pre-treatment PLR (all P < 0.05). At the end of the follow-up, 65 patients died and 53 survived. The 24-month survival rate was 97.62% in the high FAR group, significantly higher than 31.58% in the low FAR group (P < 0.001). The 24-month survival rate for the high NLR group was 91.30%, also significantly higher than 31.94% in the low NLR group (P < 0.001). In the Cox regression model, both high FAR and high NLR were identified as independent risk factors for poor prognosis in PC patients (all P < 0.05). The AUC for FAR combined with NLR in predicting the prognosis of PC patients was 0.946 (95% CI: 0.905-0.986), with a specificity of 92.30% and a sensitivity of 92.40%.
conclusionBoth FAR and NLR are correlated with prognosis in patients suffering from locally advanced or metastatic PC, and their combined detection may precisely predict prognosis in PC patients undergoing systemic chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.