ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Establishment and validation of a nomogram model for early diagnosis of gastric cancer: a large-scale cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic Value of albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) Grade in Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Prediction of tumor deposits in stage I-III gastric cancer: a clinically applicable nomogram integrating clinicopathology outcomes.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Identifying high-risk populations and diagnosing gastric cancer (GC) early remains challenging. This study aimed to establish and verify a nomogram model for the early diagnosis of GC based on conventional laboratory indicators. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 2,770 individuals with first diagnosis of GC and 1,513 patients with benign gastric disease from January 2018 to December 2022. The cases were divided into the training set and validation set randomly, with a ratio of 7:3. Variable screening was performed by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and logistic regression analysis. A nomogram was constructed in the training set to assist in the early diagnosis of GC. Results: There were 4283 patients included in the study, with 2998 patients assigned in the training set and 1285 patients in the validation set. Through LASSO regression and logistic regression analysis, independent variables associated with GC were identified, including CEA, CA199, LYM, HGB, MCH, MCHC, PLT, ALB, TG, HDL, and AFR. The nomogram model was constructed using the above 11 independent indicators. The AUC was 0.803 for the training set and 0.797 for the validation set, indicating that the model showed high clinical diagnostic efficacy. The calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) of the nomogram presented good calibration and clinical application ability. Conclusion: Based on the analysis of large sample size, we constructed a nomogram model with 11 routine laboratory indicators, which showed good discrimination ability and calibration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.