ArticlePostepy psychiatrii neurologii2024
Investigating the involvement of the left and right hemisphere in speech production and its correlation with handedness - a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study.
Article in Postepy psychiatrii neurologii, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: While traditional theories suggest a link between language lateralization and handedness, recent evidence indicates more complex neural networks underlying speech processing. This study aimed to investigate the involvement of the left and right hemispheres in speech production using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Methods: A cohort of 58 healthy volunteers with a median age of 23 (range 19-34) were included in the study. With the use of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI), 43 individuals were determined to be right-handed, 13 left-handed, 2 mix-handed and subsequently subdivided according to handedness decile values. rTMS was applied with 2Hz frequency and 2 seconds of duration over the left and right hemispheres to trigger speech arrest while counting downwards. Results: Overall prevalence of speech arrest was 96.6%. Twenty-four subjects developed speech arrest after stimulation exclusively over the left hemisphere (42.9%), two people exclusively over the right hemisphere (3.5%) and 30 participants bilaterally (53.6%). Notably, the right-handed exhibited speech arrest predominantly over the left hemisphere, while the left-handed showed more variability. Receiver operating characteristics analysis revealed handedness deciles as predictors of speech lateralization. Individuals with handedness values over the 2nd right decile of EHI were more likely to have speech arrest over the left hemisphere, while left-handed over the 7th left decile were more likely to show speech arrest after rTMS over the right hemisphere. Conclusions: This study highlights the complexity of the relationship between speech lateralization and handedness. Further research using rTMS may provide insights into the neural mechanisms underlying speech processing and enable further studies on the treatment of aphasia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.