ArticleHeliyon2024
Renewable energy, regional tourism, and exports to tackle stagnant growth in developed economies.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Integrated Computational and Biophysical Approach for Investigating the Structure-Function Impact of blaOXA-58 Mutations in Acinetobacter baumannii.Molecular biotechnology · 2026Article
- China Hebei province energy enterprises dataset.Data in brief · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based anomaly detection and prediction in commercial aircraft using autonomous surveillance data.PloS one · 2025Article
- Evaluating sports complex sustainable supply chains: A prospective assessment technique method of moments quantile regression research.PloS one · 2025Article
- Analyzing the influence of financial technology and environmental taxation on energy transformation in BRI nations.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-12-21Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Objections by Author(s) · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the effects of energy resources in the form of clean and unclean energy on the economic progress of 30 selected developed economies. This study used data from 1990 to 2020 and it employs the CS-ARDL method to obtain results. The results present that both clean and unclean energy significantly stimulate economic progress. The findings further expose that foreign investment resources in the form of inflow are significant factors that accelerate economic progress in developed economies. The results reveal that tourism development, capital accumulation, and exports are significant factors in boosting economic progress in the selected economies. Estimates from Dumitrescu and Hurlin's method for heterogeneous panels confirm the presence of the feedback-effect hypothesis for unclean energy, while the energy-conservation hypothesis holds for clean energy. This study suggests that targeting low-cost clean energy production is crucial for promoting economic growth and protecting the environment through carbon mitigation strategies. There is also a need to develop a policy framework that emphasizes the transformation of industry towards clean energy at a macro level. Furthermore, transitioning from unclean to clean energy may enhance economic progress by improving environmental quality norms in the selected developed economies. Finally, policies for tourism development, export improvement, and increased inflow of FDI should be directed towards fostering clean energy agreements and achieving environment-friendly economic progress in developed economies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.