Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39678377›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2024

Consumer-oriented (patient and family) outcomes from nursing in genomics: a scoping review of the literature (2012-2022).

Jordan N Keels, Joanne Thomas, Kathleen A Calzone, Laurie Badzek, Sarah Dewell, Vinaya Murthy, Rosie O'Shea, Emma T Tonkin, Andrew A Dwyer

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Barriers and Facilitators Influencing Nurses in Genetic Services Provision: A Systematic Review.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jordan N Keels *William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, United States.
Joanne Thomas *Genomics Policy Unit, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, United Kingdom.
Kathleen A CalzoneGlobal Genomics Nursing Alliance (G2NA) and National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Laurie BadzekGlobal Genomics Nursing Alliance (G2NA) and Ross and Carol Nese College of Nursing, Penn State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Sarah DewellGlobal Genomics Nursing Alliance (G2NA) and School of Nursing at Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, BC, Canada.
Vinaya MurthyDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Rosie O'SheaCancer Genetics Service, St. James's Hospital and Trinity College School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland.
Emma T Tonkin *Global Genomics Nursing Alliance (G2NA) and Genomics Policy Unit, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, United Kingdom.
Andrew A Dwyer *Global Genomics Nursing Alliance (G2NA) and William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, United States.

Funding

The Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Center for Reproductive MedicineP50HD104224 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI TALKOWSKI, MICHAEL E · 2021 to 2025
$7.8M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD104224Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Genomics is a lifespan competency that is important for improving health outcomes for individuals, families, and communities. Nurses play a key role in genomic healthcare and realizing the potential of the genomic era. Methods: We aimed to chart the current state of genomics in nursing by conducting a systematic scoping review of the literature in four databases (2012-2022). We categorized included articles using the Cochrane Collaboration outcome domains/sub-domains and identify key topical areas. Results: Of 8532 retrieved articles, we identified 67 articles on 'consumer-oriented outcomes' (patient and family) for analysis. Identified articles primarily centered on themes of genetic testing and screening. Most studies reported non-interventional studies 39/67 (58%) and more than half were from the U.S.A. 34/67 (51%). Six of nine subdomains were reported on. The "patient involvement in care" subdomain was the most commonly reported subdomain (17/67, 25%) while "treatment outcomes" had the fewest reports (5/67, 8%). Overall, consumers (i.e., patients and families) had high satisfaction with nurse-led interventions. Discussion: Synthesizing findings revealed key knowledge gaps and unmet patient informational needs around genetic testing and decision support. There are opportunities for interprofessional collaboration between nursing and genetic counseling to meet the mounting demand for genomic healthcare and develop more person-centered approaches to genetic counseling and decisional support. Findings support the need for interventional studies and enhanced focus on implementation for nurses to improve consumer-oriented outcomes.

Indexed as

cascade screeningdecision makingfamily historygenetic counselinggenetic testingnursing practiceoncology nursingprecision healthcare

Identifiers

PMID39678377
PMCPMC11638212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.