ArticleFrontiers in genetics2024
Correlating gene expression levels with transcription factor binding sites facilitates identification of key transcription factors from transcriptome data.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of Systems Genetics to Investigate Molecular Pathology of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.Chemical biology & drug design · 2026Review
- African Swine Fever Virus R238L and R298L Disrupt Lung Cell Collagen Formation and Cell Adhesion Pathway by Targeting Transcription Factors Containing zf-C2H2 Domain.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- TransPilot: mining key transcription factors by correlating binding sites with differentially expressed genes.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Identification of Regulators for Antigen-Specific CD8Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Procyanidin-B1-EnrichedAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Se-methylselenocysteine inhibits inflammatory response in an LPS-stimulated chicken HD11 macrophage-like cell model through the NFKB2 pathway.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identification of key transcription factors from transcriptome data by correlating gene expression levels with transcription factor binding sites is important for transcriptome data analysis. In a typical scenario, we always set a threshold to filter the top ranked differentially expressed genes and top ranked transcription factor binding sites. However, correlation analysis of filtered data can often result in spurious correlations. In this study, we tested four methods for creating the gene expression inputs (ranked gene list) in the correlation analysis: star coordinate map transformation (START), expression differential score (ED), preferential expression measure (PEM), and the specificity measure (SPM). Then, Kendall's tau correlation statistical algorithms implementing the standard (STD), LINEAR, MIX-LINEAR, DENSITY-CURVE, and MIXED-DENSITY-CURVE weighting methods were used to identify key transcription factors. ED was identified as the optimal method for creating a ranked gene list from filtered expression data, which can address the "unable to detect negative correlation" fallacy presented by other methods. The MIXED-DENSITY-CURVE was the most sensitive for identifying transcription factors from the gene set and list in which only the top proportion was correlated. Ultimately, 644 transcription factor candidates were identified from the transcriptome data of 1,206 cell lines, six of which were validated by wet lab experiments. The Jinzer and Flaver software implementing these methods can be obtained from http://www.thua45/cn/flaver under a free academic license.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.