Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39678359›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2024

Phytomedicines in Pharmacotherapy of LUTS/BPH - What Do Patients Think?

Alexander Tamalunas, Richard Paktiaval, Philipp Lenau, Leo Federico Stadelmeier, Alexander Buchner, Thomas Kolben, Giuseppe Magistro, Christian G Stief, Martin Hennenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Pine-Extracted Phytosterol β-Sitosterol (APOPROSTATPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Antagonism of prostate αThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alexander TamalunasDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4659-2262
Richard PaktiavalDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Philipp LenauDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Leo Federico StadelmeierDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alexander BuchnerDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7895-7070
Thomas KolbenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1418-8588
Giuseppe MagistroDepartment of Urology, Asklepios Westklinikum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Christian G StiefDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Martin HennenbergDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) consist of voiding and storage symptoms. While the therapeutic efficacy of current LUTS medications is limited, and with more than 20% of patients suffering from mixed symptoms, current guidelines offer nothing more than combining monotherapies. An individualized approach is urgently warranted, and phytomedicines have become an integral part of patient-empowerment in therapeutic shared-decision making processes. Therefore, we aimed to investigate patients' preference of phytomedicines and treatment adherence at the dawn of an era leaving α Patients and Methods: A questionnaire was prepared, and patients at our tertiary referral center were given the opportunity to voluntarily participate in our survey. We collected questionnaires from 300 patients during their visits from January 2022 to December 2022. Results: With 73% (218/300), most of our study cohort had either taken one or more or were currently on prescription medication for LUTS/BPH. Patients were prescribed α Conclusion: We found that phytomedicines were the second most common drug class taken by LUTS patients at our hospital. Reasons may be easy availability as over the counter medication and a superior safety profile with less bothersome side effects than commonly prescribed drug classes. Taken together, phytomedicines may be able to bridge an important gap in LUTS pharmacotherapy to provide sufficient treatment adherence where prescription drug classes fail, and ultimately, adequate improvement of symptoms. However, patients need to be counseled on potentially limited efficacy.

Indexed as

BPHdecision makingLUTSOABpatient preferencephytomedicinestreatment adherenceurology

Identifiers

PMID39678359
PMCPMC11645467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.