ArticleResearch square2024
Sustainability of a Non-pharmacological, Self-Managed Intervention for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: 3-group Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.
Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) affects around 1.7 billion people globally, causing significant physical, psychological, and economic burdens. Current treatments often involve medications with risks, creating an urgent need for accessible alternatives. Interventionist-administered Auricular Point Acupressure (APA) has shown effectiveness in reducing pain. To explore whether this low-risk, non-invasive, non-pharmacologic, and non-opioid pain relief method can be expanded digitally, this study developed a self-managed APA program using mobile health technology and coaching videos, allowing individuals to self-administer APA and evaluate its impact and sustainability. Methods: A 3-group pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted among 37 participants with CMP. The participants were randomly assigned to in-person APA (n=14) with face-to-face APA instruction, self-guided APA (n=12) with remote APA coaching, or control (n=11). All received conventional healthcare, with the APA groups also receiving adjuvant APA intervention for a 4-weeks supplemented with mobile app coaching videos, followed by monthly monitoring for three months. Data on pain intensity, physical disability, physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, fear avoidance of work, and satisfaction were collected at baseline, immediately following the 4-week APA intervention, and during the 2-month and 3-month follow-ups post-intervention. Results: Both the in-person and self-guided APA groups experienced a 47% reduction in pain intensity. Over 50% of participants achieved at least a 30% reduction in pain, and more than 17% had a 30% reduction in physical disability. Improvements included an 18% boost in physical function, decreased fatigue, improved sleep disturbance, and less depression (with increases noted in the control group), a 50% reduction in fear-avoidance of work, and only 3.8% reported not being satisfied with the APA at the 3-month follow-up. No adverse effects related to APA were reported. Conclusion: APA improved physical and mental health in participants with CMP, enhanced readiness to return to work, and demonstrated sustainability for at least three months. Coaching videos delivered via a mobile app proved to be a feasible approach for teaching APA, increasing the accessibility of the intervention. This study highlights the impact of APA and recommends further research into its mechanisms and long-term benefits to support integration into standard practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.