ArticleTobacco use insights2024
Predictors of Enrollment and Adherence in a Randomized Tobacco Cessation Clinical Trial.
Article in Tobacco use insights, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of treatment engagement in a group-based, telehealth smoking cessation program.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- Determinants of smoking cessation program completion and continued tobacco use in a referral program in West Virginia: An EHR data analysis from 2018-2023.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: New therapeutic cessation approaches are being tested in clinical trials to engage and retain people who smoke. Our team is conducting a pragmatic randomized clinical trial (RCT) to evaluate a new treatment for tobacco dependence, but enrolling participants and ensuring adherence has been more challenging than in previous trials. Objective: To determine the predictors of enrollment and adherence in the RCT. Design: A secondary analysis of data from a tobacco cessation RCT. Methods: Data was collected during a two-group RCT testing the efficacy of an integrative guided imagery vs behavioral treatment, with both conditions involving six weekly, hour-long sessions over 9 weeks. Results: Of the 1074 randomized participants, 803 (74.8%) enrolled (completed the first session), and 631 (78.6%) of those were adherent (attended all scheduled sessions). Variables associated with enrollment included age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.01; 95% CI, 1.0003-1.02; Conclusion: Enrolling and retaining people who smoke in cessation trials requires novel strategies. Identifying predictors of enrollment and adherence offers valuable insights for overcoming barriers in future tobacco cessation RCTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.