Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39678264›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X2024

Autoencoder-based inverse design and surrogate-based optimization of an integrated wet granulation manufacturing process.

Ashley Dan, Rohit Ramachandran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of pharmaceutics: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ashley DanDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Rohit RamachandranDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In pharmaceutical manufacturing, integrating model-based design and optimization can be beneficial for accelerating process development. This study explores the utilization of Machine Learning (ML) techniques as a surrogate model for the optimization of a three-unit wet-granulation based flowsheet model for solid dosage form manufacturing. First, a reduced representation of a wet granulation flowsheet model is developed, incorporating a granulation and milling process, along with a novel dissolution model that accounts for the effect of particle size, porosity, and microstructure on dissolution rate. Two optimization approaches are compared, including an autoencoder-based inverse design and a surrogate-based forward optimization. Both methods address the bi-objective problem of maximizing dissolution time and product yield by identifying the optimal granulation and mill process parameters. For this case study, both approaches were effective and incurred a similar computational cost, averaging under 4 s. However, the autoencoder approach offers an advantage through dimensionality reduction, a feature not available in surrogate-based optimization. Dimensional reduction is particularly beneficial for complex process designs with numerous inputs and outputs. The lower dimensional representation helps improve process understanding through enhanced visualization of the process design space and facilitates feasibility studies involving multiple constraints. The autoencoder-based inverse design introduced in this work showcases an implementation of AI and ML in pharmaceutical process development, demonstrating the potential to enhance process efficiency and product quality in complex manufacturing scenarios.

Indexed as

AutoencodersDesignGranulationMachine LearningOptimizationPharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID39678264
PMCPMC11639451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.