Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39678234›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2024

A rapid review of digital approaches for the participatory development of health-related interventions.

Friederike Doerwald, Imke Stalling, Carina Recke, Heide Busse, Rehana Shrestha, Stefan Rach, Karin Bammann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Friederike DoerwaldInstitute for Public Health and Nursing Research (IPP), Working Group Epidemiology of Demographic Change, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Imke StallingInstitute for Public Health and Nursing Research (IPP), Working Group Epidemiology of Demographic Change, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Carina ReckeInstitute for Public Health and Nursing Research (IPP), Working Group Epidemiology of Demographic Change, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Heide BusseLeibniz ScienceCampus Digital Public Health Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Rehana ShresthaLeibniz ScienceCampus Digital Public Health Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Stefan RachLeibniz ScienceCampus Digital Public Health Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Karin BammannInstitute for Public Health and Nursing Research (IPP), Working Group Epidemiology of Demographic Change, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Using participatory approaches to design health interventions is promising, and the ongoing digitalization has enabled the development of diverse digital formats for this purpose. These digital formats bring forth distinct advantages and challenges that should be carefully considered. This rapid review aims to present an overview of digital formats employed in participatory health intervention development and their reported benefits and barriers. Design: A qualitative rapid review was conducted, following recommendations by the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. The literature search was carried out in October 2022 and encompassed the PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Studies were included if they were published in 2010 or later and reported the development of a health-related intervention employing digital formats in the participatory process. Results: A total of 22 studies were included. We identified three types of digital formats used for participatory health intervention development: web-based participatory formats ( Conclusion: The review shows a variety of digital formats employed to develop participatory health interventions. Yet, these methods are primarily digital adaptations of pre-existing analog formats. Innovative digital approaches involving, for example, virtual reality devices remain largely unused. The review also revealed a need for establishing shared terminology and reporting standards to facilitate communication, comparison, and synthesis of findings in this evolving area of research.

Indexed as

Digital TechnologyCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchHealth PromotionHumansInternetQualitative Researchaction researchcommunity participationco-researchdigital methodshealth promotionpublic health

Identifiers

PMID39678234
PMCPMC11638186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.