ReviewFrontiers in public health2024
A rapid review of digital approaches for the participatory development of health-related interventions.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of a Mobile Phone-Based Life-Skills Training Program for Addiction Prevention Optimized Among Adolescents With Low Program Engagement: Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Trial
- Bridging the health literacy gap: Women and community stakeholders' perspectives on maternal and child health communication in peri-urban Karachi, Pakistan.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Community-informed design of personalized patient-facing materials to facilitate ED-initiated treatment of opioid use disorder.PEC innovation · 2026Article
- Clinical Teaching Fellow programmes as a strategy to support the delivery of NHS workforce priorities: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Designing Electronic Problem-Solving Training for Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury: Mixed Methods, Community-Based, Participatory Research Case Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Emotion dysregulation as a marker in adolescent mental health with EEG-based prediction model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Key Components of Participatory Design Workshops for Digital Health Solutions: Nominal Group Technique and Feasibility Study.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2025Article
- User perceptions and preferences for GeoHealth tools: A qualitative focus group study of non-expert and expert users.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Using participatory approaches to design health interventions is promising, and the ongoing digitalization has enabled the development of diverse digital formats for this purpose. These digital formats bring forth distinct advantages and challenges that should be carefully considered. This rapid review aims to present an overview of digital formats employed in participatory health intervention development and their reported benefits and barriers. Design: A qualitative rapid review was conducted, following recommendations by the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. The literature search was carried out in October 2022 and encompassed the PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Studies were included if they were published in 2010 or later and reported the development of a health-related intervention employing digital formats in the participatory process. Results: A total of 22 studies were included. We identified three types of digital formats used for participatory health intervention development: web-based participatory formats ( Conclusion: The review shows a variety of digital formats employed to develop participatory health interventions. Yet, these methods are primarily digital adaptations of pre-existing analog formats. Innovative digital approaches involving, for example, virtual reality devices remain largely unused. The review also revealed a need for establishing shared terminology and reporting standards to facilitate communication, comparison, and synthesis of findings in this evolving area of research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.